7 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2020. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, CVE-2016-9860. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, and CVE-2016-9860. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-9858, CVE-2016-9859, and/or CVE-2016-986...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6846, CVE-2014-6847. Reason: this ID was intended for one issue, but was assigned to two issues by a CNA. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2014-6846 and CVE-2014-6847 to determine which ID is appropriate. All reference...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-7266, CVE-2013-7267, CVE-2013-7268, CVE-2013-7269, CVE-2013-7270, CVE-2013-7271. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-7266, CVE-2013-7267, CVE-2013-7268, CVE-2013-7269, CVE-2013-7270, and CVE-2013-7271. Notes: Al...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, CVE-2010-4209. Reason: This candidate originally combined three issues that affected different versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, or CVE-2010-4209 instead of thi...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-4409. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-4409. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-4409 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...