Input validation

A CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index vulnerability exists that could cause local denial-of-service, and potentially kernel execution when a malicious actor with local user access crafts a script/program using an unpredictable index to an IOCTL call in the Foxboro.sys driver...

CVE-2023-2570

A CWE-129: Improper Validation of Array Index vulnerability exists that could cause local denial-of-service, and potentially kernel execution when a malicious actor with local user access crafts a script/program using an unpredictable index to an IOCTL call in the Foxboro.sys driver...

CVE-2023-2569

CVE-2023-2569 affects Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Foxboro DCS components, with the Foxboro.sys driver exposing an Out-of-Bounds Write via an IOCTL call. The concrete root cause described across sources is a boundary/array bound error while handling untrusted input, enabling a local attacker wi...

CVE-2023-2569

A CWE-787: Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability exists that could cause local denial-of-service, elevation of privilege, and potentially kernel execution when a malicious actor with local user access crafts a script/program using an IOCTL call in the Foxboro.sys driver...

CVE-2023-29369

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability...

CVE-2023-29369

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability...

CVE-2023-29369

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability...

Denial of service

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability...

Success value and msg.value not checked in llamaExecutor.sol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Success value not checked. Result can fail silently. Msg.value can be lost. Proof of Concept Function execute does not check the validity of success. If execute is called and msg.value is greater than value, then excess msg.value will be stucked in...

ink! 安全漏洞

ink! is an eDSL that writes smart contracts for blockchains built on the Substrate framework. A security vulnerability exists in ink! version 4.0.0 and earlier that stems from incorrect decoding of stored values when using DelegateCall...

Gas griefing/thief in LlamaAccount execute()

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact LlamaAccount execute function either delegatecall or call to the provided address. The address may contain malicious contract and should be treated as a malicious. This assumption was confirmed by implementation of this function and its comments...

PT-2023-24884 · Ink! · Ink!

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: ink! versions 4.0.0 through 4.2.1 Description: The return value when using delegate call mechanics, either through CallBuilder::delegate or ink env::invoke contract delegate, is decoded incorrectly. This issue is related to the mechanics arou...

The low-level call returns true if the address does not exist

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As written in the Solidity documentation , the call, delegatecall and staticcall low-level functions return true as its first return value if the account being invoked does not exist, as part of the design of the EVM. The existence of the account must be...

CVE-2023-29369

Technical details about CVE-2023-29369 are not provided in the supplied documents; no affected products, root cause, or remediation are disclosed here. Monitor for updates from official advisories and connected sources as they become available.

CVE-2023-2801

A flaw was found in grafana. This issue occurs when sending an API call to the /ds/query or public dashboard query endpoint that has mixed queries, such as having two or more distinct data sources in one API call. As a result, the Grafana instance will crash. Currently, the only feature that uses...

Remote Procedure Call Runtime Denial of Service Vulnerability

...

PT-2023-3123 · Microsoft · Windows Server +1

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Windows Server Service affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to errors in security settings of the Windows Server operating system, allowing a remote attacker to bypass access checks to RPC procedures using a...

[ H ] In executeAction function, ETH can remain stuck after reverting due to a failed call.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If and when the executeAction function reverts at either of the checks, the amount of ETH sent along with the call will be locked in the contract forever, with no current measures of recovery. Proof of Concept executeAction is called, but the call fails ...

Microsoft Windows Remote Procedure Call Runtime 安全漏洞

Microsoft Windows Remote Procedure Call Runtime is a powerful technology for creating distributed client/server programs from Microsoft Corporation USA. A security vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows Remote Procedure Call Runtime. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause a deni...

PT-2023-3216 · Microsoft · Windows

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Windows affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to insufficient input validation in the Remote Procedure Call Runtime, which can lead to a denial-of-service condition. This can be exploited by a remote attacker to...