PT-2022-3714 · Microsoft · Windows

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Windows affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to the Advanced Local Procedure Call ALPC handler in the Windows operating system, which has insufficient access control. This can allow an attacker to elevate their...

Microsoft Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call Elevation of Privilege (CVE-2022-30202)

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Windows. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system...

KLA12581 Multiple vulnerabilities in Microsoft Products (ESU)

Multiple vulnerabilities were found in Microsoft Products Extended Security Update. Malicious users can exploit these vulnerabilities to gain privileges, bypass security restrictions, obtain sensitive information, execute arbitrary code, cause denial of service. Below is a complete list of...

PT-2022-3794 · Microsoft · Windows

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Microsoft Windows affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to incorrect code generation management in the Remote Procedure Call Runtime of the Microsoft Windows operating system. This allows a remote attacker to execu...

CVE-2022-33701

Improper access control vulnerability in KnoxCustomManagerService prior to SMR Jul-2022 Release 1 allows attacker to call PowerManaer.goToSleep method which is protected by system permission by sending braodcast intent...

CVE-2022-33689

The CVE-2022-33689 entry concerns Samsung TelephonyUI with an improper access control issue. Affected software: TelephonyUI prior to the SMR July 2022 Release 1. Root cause: lack of proper permission checks allows an unprotected binder call to change the device’s preferred network type. Impact: a...

photo_tag 路径遍历漏洞

phototag is a photo tagging tool by the individual developer of Boring YiBa. A security vulnerability exists in phototag version 2020-08-31 and earlier versions, which stems from an incorrect call to Flask's sendfile function that results in absolute path traversal...

PT-2022-21804 · Unknown · Telephonyui

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: TelephonyUI versions prior to SMR Jul-2022 Release 1 Description: The issue is related to improper access control in TelephonyUI, allowing attackers to modify the preferred network type through an unprotected binder call. Recommendations: For...

Increase balance for project without paying

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It seems that project owners can directly call recordAddedBalanceFor function at JBSingleTokenPaymentTerminalStore.solL696 to increase their project balance without paying anything Proof of Concept 1. Observe the recordAddedBalanceFor function 2. There i...

PT-2022-22812

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions rpc.py versions through 0.6.0 Description The issue allows Remote Code Execution because an unpickle occurs when the serializer: pickle HTTP header is sent. Although JSON is the default data format, an unauthenticated client can cause the data...

Cisco Unified Communications Manager Arbitrary File Read Vulnerability

Cisco Unified Communications Manager CUCM, Unified CM, CallManager is a call-processing component of a unified communications system from Cisco. The component provides a scalable, distributable and highly available enterprise IP telephony call processing solution. An arbitrary file read...

CVE-2022-22677

A logic issue in the handling of concurrent media was addressed with improved state handling. This issue is fixed in macOS Monterey 12.4, iOS 15.5 and iPadOS 15.5. Video self-preview in a webRTC call may be interrupted if the user answers a phone call...

Denial Of Service (DoS)

webkit2gtk is vulnerable to denial of service. The vulnerability exists due to a logic issue in video self-preview feature in a webrtc call, which can be interrupted if the user answers a phone call...

Zero strike call options can be systemically used to steal premium from the taker

Lines of code Vulnerability details Some non-malicious ERC20 do not allow for zero amount transfers and order.baseAsset can be such an asset. Zero strike calls are valid and common enough derivative type. However, the zero strike calls with such baseAsset will not be able to be exercised, allowin...

Doesn’t check order.baseAsset.code when exercising call order

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It is safe to check order.baseAsset.code.length and token.code.length in fillOrder and transferERC20sIn. Because SafeTransferLib doesn’t check whether the erc20 token is actually a contract. /// @dev Note that none of the functions in this library check...

Any one can mint penny NFT to take some advantage

Lines of code Vulnerability details Any one can mint penny NFT to take some advantage Impact Some users might be taken advantage of, for those who long call or short put the floortoken, and finnally lead to loss of these users. Proof of Concept There is no control over the floortoken platform,...

Attacker can take premium from taker who fill short-call orders for free.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Takers who fill short-call orders may unable to exercise their long-call position. Attackers can abuse it to take premium from takers for free. In PuttyV2.fillOrder function, when taker fill short-call order, order’s maker only has to transfer erc20Asset...

Cannot create short call floorToken option

Lines of code Vulnerability details The solution is not supporting maker shorting a call of N floorToken although platform declare it support all four types: short\long call\put Proof of Concept Exercising an option is done one-sided by the long taker, at this point the floorTokens should be...

Problems with the access control of the fillOrder() function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. fillOrder does not check order.maker ! = caller, which means that mintorder.maker, uint256orderHash; & mintmsg.sender, positionId; can mint NFT to the same person and therefore may create unintended...

Returned Value not checked when Depositing Eth

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In fillorder function, when eth is converted to weth, at line 335, it deposit the msg.value here. But it does not check the return value if the call succeeded. Proof of Concept IWETHweth.depositvalue: msg.value; Tools Used Visual Studio Code Recommended...