Lucene search
+L

14133 matches found

UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-11721

It is possible for an attacker's zone to respond to a query with an RRSIG that has a smaller number of labels than the zone in which the RRSIG is contained. This causes named to produce a wildcard name for a zone that is shorter than the attacker's zone, which can result in cache poisoning. For...

7.5CVSS5.7AI score0.00395EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-13204

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•19 views

CVE-2026-11331

An attacker who knows or guesses that a resolver uses RPZ with wildcard CNAME policies can craft query names long enough to trigger a NAMETOOLONG error condition during RPZ processing. This is not handled correctly and may lead to defeating the RPZ rule. It also may lead to an unexpected exit of...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00428EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•13 views

CVE-2026-11622

A DNSSEC validating resolver that is under a random subdomain attack against a DNSSEC-signed zone can suffer from runaway memory usage. The attacker needs to be able to send queries faster than the resolver can perform validation. The increased memory usage can be orders of magnitude beyond the...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00542EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•16 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•21 views

CVE-2026-12617

The issue is unexpected program termination based on ordering and/or specific content in responses to queries for CNAME or DNAME, and A records. Specifically, if a client queries for a DNAME and A record below the DNAME to the resolver, and the authoritative server responds positively to the A...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00501EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•16 views

CVE-2026-11605

The issue is a resource exhaustion vulnerability associated with DNSSEC validation. BIND always validates all RRSIG records in an answer, even if they are not strictly needed. A query to an authoritative server/zone which returns many valid but superfluous RRSIG records causes the validator to...

7.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
UbuntuCve
UbuntuCve
•added 2026/07/22 3:16 p.m.•21 views

CVE-2026-10822

If BIND encounters a particular invalid data structure in a DNS record, it will accept the invalid data, and may subsequently abort and exit. BIND will first need to store a DNS record for a key KEY, DNSKEY, etc.. That key must specify a PRIVATEDNS algorithm 253, and in the algorithm identifier,...

6.5CVSS5.8AI score0.00381EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•3 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

9.2CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•23 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References4Affected Software1
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•15 views

EUVD-2026-47713

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•178 views

CVE-2026-13321

The CVE relates to BIND DNSSEC validation: the resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records whose Next Domain Name points outside the signer's zone, enabling potential DNSSEC validation bypass. Affected are BIND 9 releases across multiple series: 9.11.0–9.18.50, 9.20.0–9.20.24, 9.21.0–9.21.23, an...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•77 views

CVE-2026-13321 DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•13 views

CVE-2026-13321 DNSSEC Validation Bypass via Out-of-Zone NSEC Next Field

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
AlpineLinux
AlpineLinux
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•28 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0
Debian CVE
Debian CVE
•added 2026/07/22 2:16 p.m.•25 views

CVE-2026-13321

The BIND resolver accepts validly-signed NSEC records where the "Next Domain Name" field points outside the signer's zone. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.24, 9.21.0 through 9.21.23, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.24-S1...

8.6CVSS5.8AI score0.00207EPSS
SaveExploits0
Mend
Mend
•added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.•3 views

CVE-2026-13204

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

8.7CVSS5.9AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.•13 views

CVE-2026-13204 Unexpected exit in certain situations with NSEC and NSEC3 both present

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.•19 views

EUVD-2026-47712

If a provably insecure domain is covered by both an NSEC and NSEC3 record at the parent, and there exist an RRSIG for only one of these types, then BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion while validating this proof. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/07/22 2:15 p.m.•106 views

CVE-2026-13204

CVE-2026-13204 affects BIND 9 up to 9.18.50, 9.20.24, 9.21.23 and related S1 variants. If a provably insecure domain is covered by both NSEC and NSEC3 at the parent and an RRSIG exists for only one type, BIND may exit unexpectedly with an assertion during proof validation. Mitigation is to upgrad...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score0.00523EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Rows per page
Query Builder