6 matches found
Linux Distros Unpatched Vulnerability : CVE-2022-38398
The Linux/Unix host has one or more packages installed that are impacted by a vulnerability without a vendor supplied patch available. - Server-Side Request Forgery SSRF vulnerability in Batik of Apache XML Graphics allows an attacker to load a url thru the jar protocol. This issue affects Apache...
Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in batik-all library affects IBM Engineering Test Management (ETM) (CVE-2022-38648, CVE-2022-40146, CVE-2022)
Summary This Security Vulnerablity has been addressed in IBM Engineering Test Management in newer releases Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2022-38648 DESCRIPTION: Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by a flaw when calling the fop function. By sending a...
Jira is affected by CVE-2022-42890 &
This affects the Batik library from v1.0 - v1.15 Jira 9.0.0 uses Batik v1.14. More information on vulnerability at: Information Exposure CVE-2022-41704|https://asecurityteam.atlassian.net/browse/VULN-1041609 Remote Code Execution RCE...
Mageia: Security Advisory (MGASA-2021-0168)
The remote host is missing an update for the SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2022 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only ifdescription...
batik: SSRF via "xlink:href"
A flaw was found in the Apache Batik library, where it is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack SSRF via "xlink:href" attributes. This flaw allows an attacker to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system...
Security Bulletin: Vulnerability in Apache Batik affects IBM Cúram Social Program Management (CVE-2018-8013)
Summary IBM Cúram Social Program Management uses the Apache Batik Library. In Apache Batik library prior to version 1.10, the class type has not being checked during the deserialization process of the subclass of AbstractDocument. Fix has been put in place to check the class type before...