Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

CVE-2020-5472

This CVE entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.

CVE-2020-5440

CVE-2020-5440 is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.

CVE-2020-13221

CVE-2020-13221 is rejected/not used; this CVE ID does not represent an active vulnerability entry.

CVE-2020-13200

CVE-2020-13200 is a rejected/not used entry per the initial description.

CVE-2018-10332

CVE-2018-10332 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.

@convergence/jointjs-utils (>=0.1.0 <=0.4.0), @davidyaha/graphql-birdseye (>=1.0.7 <=1.0.8) +33 more potentially affected by CVE-2020-28480 via jointjs (>=0.9.10 <=3.2.0)

jointjs NPM version =0.9.10, =0.1.0, =1.0.7, =0.1.0, =0.1.3, =0.8.2, =1.5.30, =1.0.1, =1.0.0-alpha.1, =1.0.0, =0.0.3, =0.1.0, =1.0.6, =1.3.0 and more Source cves: CVE-2020-28480 Source advisory: OSV:GHSA-QWP9-52H8-XGG8...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

Design/Logic Flaw

Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none...

CVE-2020-6674

CVE-2020-6674 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.

CVE-2019-4547

IBM Security Directory Server 6.4.0 generates an error message that includes sensitive information about its environment, users, or associated data. IBM X-Force ID: 165949...

Use-after-free

graphicsmagick:xenial is vulnerable to use-after-free. The ReadWMFImage function in coders/wmf.c has a use-after-free issue for data associated with exception reporting...

Rethinking Defensive Strategy at the Edge, Part 1: A Changing Landscape for Securing Users

In recent years, new enterprise remote access architectures and frameworks have been introduced, such as Zero Trust Access ZTA. Those concepts have driven changes in the way the network perimeter has been defined -- specifically, from the outside in, not the inside out. Access to applications and...

CVE-2019-4699

IBM Security Guardium Data Encryption GDE 3.0.0.2 generates an error message that includes sensitive information about its environment, users, or associated data. IBM X-Force ID: 171931...