CVE-2025-32326

In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-32331

In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-0089

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to hijack the Launcher app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-48559

In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible add a large amount of app ops due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-48559

In multiple functions of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible add a large amount of app ops due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-48558

In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitatio...

CVE-2025-48558

In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitatio...

CVE-2025-48558

In multiple functions of BatteryService.java, there is a possible way to hijack implicit intent intended for system app due to Implicit intent hijacking. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitatio...

CVE-2025-48558

CVE-2025-48558 affects the Android BatteryService.java component, where multiple functions could enable implicit intent hijacking of a system app. This yields local elevation of privilege without extra privileges or user interaction. The connected documents confirm the vulnerability type and impa...

CVE-2025-48549

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to record audio via a background app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-48549

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to record audio via a background app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-48549

This CVE (CVE-2025-48549) describes an elevation of privilege in Google Android where a background app can potentially record audio due to a missing permission check. The issue is local and requires no user interaction; exploitation is described as local with high impact. Android's security bulle...

CVE-2025-48544

In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files belonging to other apps due to SQL injection. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-48535

In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java , there is a possible way to exploit a parcel mismatch resulting in a launch anywhere vulnerability due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. Us...

CVE-2025-48535

In assertSafeToStartCustomActivity of AppRestrictionsFragment.java , there is a possible way to exploit a parcel mismatch resulting in a launch anywhere vulnerability due to unsafe deserialization. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. Us...

CVE-2025-32345

The CVE-2025-32345 issue affects Android’s ContentProtectionTogglePreferenceController.java (updateState), where a logic error allows a secondary user to disable the primary user’s deceptive app scanning setting. This enables local privilege escalation with no additional privileges or user intera...

CVE-2025-32331

In showDismissibleKeyguard of KeyguardService.java, there is a possible way to bypass app pinning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-32331

CVE-2025-32331 involves a logic error in showDismissibleKeyguard within KeyguardService.java that could allow bypassing app pinning, enabling local escalation of privilege without user interaction. The connected sources consistently describe a local-privilege-elevation scenario tied to KeyguardSe...

CVE-2025-32326

CVE-2025-32326 describes a local elevation of privilege in Android via a confused deputy in AppRestrictionsFragment.java, enabling bypass of the intent security check. Impact is local with user interaction required; no additional execution privileges needed. Root cause: insecure bypass in multipl...

CVE-2025-32326

In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation...