CVE-2019-6661

When the BIG-IP APM 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, 12.1.0-12.1.4.1, or 11.5.1-11.6.5 system processes certain requests, the APD/APMD daemon may consume excessive resources...

F5 BIG-IP APM CVE-2019-6661 Denial of Service Vulnerability

Description F5 BIG-IP APM is prone to a denial-of-service vulnerability. Attackers can exploit this issue to cause excessive resource consumption, resulting in a denial-of-service condition. BIG-IP APM 14.1.0 through 14.1.2, 14.0.0 through 14.0.1, 13.0.0 through 13.1.3, 12.1.0 through 12.1.4, and...

Security Bulletin: IBM Application Performance Management could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim (CVE-2019-4086)

Summary IBM Application Performance Management could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attac...

F5 Networks BIG-IP : BIG-IP APM client for Windows vulnerability (K10015187)

Windows Logon Integration feature of F5 BIG-IP APM client prior to version 7.1.7.1 for Windows by default uses Legacy logon mode which uses a SYSTEM account to establish network access. This feature displays a certificate user interface dialog box which contains the link to the certificate policy...

CVE-2019-6656

BIG-IP APM Edge Client before version 7.1.8 7180.2019.508.705 logs the full apm session ID in the log files. Vulnerable versions of the client are bundled with BIG-IP APM versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14,1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5. In BIG-IP APM...

CVE-2019-6656

BIG-IP APM Edge Client before version 7.1.8 7180.2019.508.705 logs the full apm session ID in the log files. Vulnerable versions of the client are bundled with BIG-IP APM versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14,1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5. In BIG-IP APM...

Code injection

BIG-IP APM Edge Client before version 7.1.8 7180.2019.508.705 logs the full apm session ID in the log files. Vulnerable versions of the client are bundled with BIG-IP APM versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14,1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5. In BIG-IP APM...

CVE-2019-6656

CVE-2019-6656 — Summary (concrete details from connected docs) Affected: BIG-IP APM Edge Client prior to 7.1.8 (7180.2019.508.705) and vulnerable client bundles across BIG-IP APM versions 11.5.1–15.0.1. In BIG-IP APM 13.1.0 and later, APM Client components can be updated independently from the BI...

CVE-2019-6656

BIG-IP APM Edge Client before version 7.1.8 7180.2019.508.705 logs the full apm session ID in the log files. Vulnerable versions of the client are bundled with BIG-IP APM versions 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14,1.0-14.1.0.6, 14.0.0-14.0.0.4, 13.0.0-13.1.1.5, 12.1.0-12.1.5, and 11.5.1-11.6.5. In BIG-IP APM...

F5 Networks BIG-IP : BIG-IP APM Edge Client logging vulnerability (K23876153)

BIG-IP APM Edge Client logs the full BIG-IP APM session ID in the log files.CVE-2019-6656 Impact This vulnerability may allow unauthorized disclosure of the BIG-IP APM session ID and expose sensitive information to the userof the client device. C Tenable Network Security, Inc. The descriptive tex...

CVE-2019-4086

IBM Cloud Application Performance Management 8.1.4 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further...

Design/Logic Flaw

IBM Cloud Application Performance Management 8.1.4 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further...

CVE-2019-4086

CVE-2019-4086 affects IBM Cloud Application Performance Management (APM) 8.1.4 (Base Private/Advanced Private) and related APM components. A remote attacker could hijack a victim’s clicking actions by enticing them to visit a malicious site, potentially enabling further attacks. The IBM advisory ...

CVE-2019-4086

IBM Cloud Application Performance Management 8.1.4 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further...

Arbitrary Proxy Redirection

elasticapm is vulnerable to arbitrary proxy redirection. A variable name precedence bug due to the way HTTPPROXY and HTTPSPROXY are parsed, causes the proxy header to be incorrectly processed. This allows allow a remote attacker to redirect collected APM data to an arbitrary proxy...

CVE-2019-7617

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...

CVE-2019-7617

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...

Design/Logic Flaw

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...

apm-agent-utils (>=1.0.3 <=1.3.0), enochecker (>=0.0.5 <=0.0.9) +1 more potentially affected by CVE-2019-7617 via elastic-apm (>=4.2.2 <=5.10.1)

elastic-apm PYPI version =4.2.2, =1.0.3, =0.0.5, =0.0.14, =0.0.24.post2 Source cves: CVE-2019-7617 Source advisory: OSV:PYSEC-2019-178...

PYSEC-2019-178

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...