CVE-2020-28931

Lack of an anti-CSRF token in the entire administrative interface in EPSON EPS TSE Server 8 21.0.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to force an administrator to execute external POST requests by visiting a malicious website...

EPSON EPS TSE Server Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability

EPSON EPS TSE Server is a server from EPSON Japan. EPSON EPS TSE Server 8 suffers from a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that stems from a lack of anti-csrf tokens throughout the administration interface, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to exploit the vulnerability by visiting a...

This One Time on a Pen Test: CSRF to Password Reset Phishing

Each year, Rapid7 penetration testers complete hundreds of internally and externally based penetration testing service engagements. This post is part of an ongoing series featuring testimonials of what goes on beneath the hoodie. For more insights, check out our 2020 Under the Hoodie report...

DRIVE.NET, Inc.: [www.drive2.ru] CSRF through FCTX token bypass

During login on the login page, login is attempted through the FCTX token. In addition, the login page was implemented through g-recaptcha-response captcha, but an attacker can bypass g-recaptcha-response captcha without FCTX tokens, and login CSRF is possible. The issue was fixed by enabling the...

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

genix/cms is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery CSRF. An improper fix to a previous vulnerability CVE-2015-2680 allows an attacker with any valid anti-CSRF tokens to perform a CSRF attack on another user and submit requests on behalf of the user...

CVE-2020-8658

The BestWebSoft Htaccess plugin through 1.8.1 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=htaccess.php&action=htaccesseditor CSRF. The flag htccssnoncename passes the nonce to WordPress but the plugin does not validate it correctly, resulting in a wrong implementation of anti-CSRF protection. In...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

The BestWebSoft Htaccess plugin through 1.8.1 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=htaccess.php&action=htaccesseditor CSRF. The flag htccssnoncename passes the nonce to WordPress but the plugin does not validate it correctly, resulting in a wrong implementation of anti-CSRF protection. In...

CVE-2020-8658

The BestWebSoft Htaccess plugin through 1.8.1 for WordPress allows wp-admin/admin.php?page=htaccess.php&action=htaccesseditor CSRF. The flag htccssnoncename passes the nonce to WordPress but the plugin does not validate it correctly, resulting in a wrong implementation of anti-CSRF protection. In...

CVE-2019-16326

D-Link DIR-601 B1 2.00NA devices have CSRF because no anti-CSRF token is implemented. A remote attacker could exploit this in conjunction with CVE-2019-16327 to enable remote router management and device compromise. NOTE: this is an end-of-life product...

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

drill-yarn is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery CSRF. Lack of anti-CSRF tokens usage and validation prevented the server from verifying the authenticity of web requests, which would allow for remote attackers to submit requests on behalf of the authenticated users when they are tricked int...

CVE-2019-10177

It was found that PDF export component in CloudForms was vulnerable to cross-side scripting XSS as user input was not properly sanitized. An authenticated attacker with privileges to edit compute could use the XSS vulnerability against users, which could lead to arbitrary code execution, and...

LimeSurvey < 3.17.14 Multiple Vulnerabilities

LimeSurvey is prone to multiple vulnerabilities. SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2019 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only ifdescription...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

Limesurvey before 3.17.14 uses an anti-CSRF cookie without the HttpOnly flag, which allows attackers to access a cookie value via a client-side script...

CVE-2019-16187

LimeSurvey prior to 3.17.14 is affected. The root cause is an anti‑CSRF cookie that is not HttpOnly, allowing client‑side scripts to access the cookie value. This can lead to exposure of cookie data and constitutes a high-risk issue per CVSS2/3.1 metrics (base scores 5.0/7.5 respectively). The ad...

U.S. Dept Of Defense: [████████] — XSS on `/███████_flight/images` via `advanced_val` parameter

Description POST parameter advancedval is vulnerable to reflected XSS on endpoint https://███/██████████flight/images. XSS affects all users and no authentication or login is required. Proof of Concept Either visit the following URL for PoC: https://██████████/poc/ Or, create your own PoC file:...

CVE-2019-7857

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can cause unwanted items to be added to a shopper's cart due to an insufficiently robust anti-CSRF token implementation...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can cause unwanted items to be added to a shopper's cart due to an insufficiently robust anti-CSRF token implementation...

CVE-2019-7857

A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Magento 2.1 prior to 2.1.18, Magento 2.2 prior to 2.2.9, Magento 2.3 prior to 2.3.2 can cause unwanted items to be added to a shopper's cart due to an insufficiently robust anti-CSRF token implementation...

Rockstar Games: CSRF Vulnerabiliy on Facebook Linkage Page Allows Full Account takerover of Socialclub Accounts.

In this report, the researcher identified a CSRF vulnerability in the account linking process that could have allowed attackers to link their Facebook account to the victim's Social Club account, giving the attacker access to the victim's Social Club account. This attack would have required a...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

In MailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.23, the potential cross-site request forgery CSRF protection mechanism was not implemented correctly and it was possible to bypass it by removing the anti-CSRF token parameter from the request. This could allow an attacker to manipulate a user into unwittingly...