CVE-2023-42319

Geth aka go-ethereum through 1.13.4, when --http --graphql is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service memory consumption and daemon hang via a crafted GraphQL query. NOTE: the vendor's position is that the "graphql endpoint is not designed to withstand attacks by hostile client...

delegateMulti(...) Griefing Attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A call to delegateMulti... with the right parameters will consume much gas and waste memory for Proxy Delegators DoS costing the attacker very little. Proof of Concept Calling delegateMulti with many unique targets and amounts of 0 consumes Proxy...

Rounding error leading to no reward being sent

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Rounding errors could occur if the provided amount is too small, Proof of Concept rewardsToSend += inRangeLiquidityOfPosition concRewardPerWeekpoolIdxweek / overallInRangeLiquidity; uint256 rewardsForWeek = timeWeightedWeeklyPositionAmbLiquidity poolIdx...

M-10 Unmitigated

Lines of code Vulnerability details Issue not mitigated About the problem There was unsafe cast in the getTier function and warden has stated, that in case if value will be bigger than uint96.max, then wrong prize amount will be used. Solution Pool together has increased Tier.prizeSize variable t...

PT-2023-19312 · Unknown · Swagpaypal +1

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: SwagPayPal versions prior to 5.4.4 Description: The issue affects JavaScript-based PayPal checkout methods, including PayPal Plus, Smart Payment Buttons, SEPA, Pay Later, Venmo, and Credit card. When these methods are used, the amount and ite...

Losses in Pair and LendgineRouter can be generated if used with ERC20 Tokens with fee on transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Losses in Pair and LendgineRouter can be generated if used with ERC20 Tokens with fee on transfer Summary Some tokens token1, token0, ... are used over the code that can be any kind of ERC20 token. If this token includes fees on transfer, some operations will...

_transferFrom() in Pair contract doesn't update approval amounts when transferring user fractional tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Contract Pair is and ERC20 token which represents user fractional token balance and it has all the features of the standard ERC20 tokens. function transferFrom has been written for transferring token but the logic isn't complete and it doesn't consider...

Token decimals may be above 18 leading to underflow issues

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In both StableVault and Trading, there is an assumption that token decimal amounts are =18. However this can break if token decimals are 18, resulting in underflow which can lead to unpredictable behaviors, and extreme amounts during deposits and...

Public to all funds escape

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description The LooksRareAggregator smart contract implements a bunch of functions to escape funds by the contract owner see rescueETH, rescueERC20, rescueERC721, and rescueERC1155. In this way, any funds that were accidentally sent to the contract or were lock...

Outdated Claims can be created which will potentially inflate the vested amounts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Overview In creating claims, the VTVLVesting contract uses various time related variables including startTimestamp and endTimestamp which determines when the linear vesting starts and ends consecutively. This is visible in the createClaim , createClaimsBatch an...

Loss of vested amounts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Vesting is a legal term that means the point in time where property is earned or gained by some person. The VTVLVesting contract defines: a start time Claim::startTimestamp and an end time Claim::endTimestamp at which vesting starts and ends for a entitl...

Broken pro-rata formula

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The README.md states: Intended to redeem TRIBE from the effective circulating supply in exchange for a pro rata portion of a list of ERC-20 tokens. Users redeeming the same number of shares get different amounts, meaning that if you are late to redeem,...

# WRONG DESIGN/IMPLEMENTATION OF ADDLIQUIDITY() ALLOWS ATTACKER TO STEAL FUNDS FROM THE LIQUIDITY POOL

Lines of code Vulnerability details The current design/implementation of Vader pool allows users to addLiquidity using arbitrary amounts instead of a fixed ratio of amounts in comparison to Uni v2. We believe this design is flawed and it essentially allows anyone to manipulate the price of the po...

Multiplication performed after division can truncate the results

Lines of code Vulnerability details Multiplication performed after division can truncate the results Impact Solidity could truncate the results, performing multiplication before division will prevent rounding/truncation in solidity math. Details This can affect variables such as slopes, interests...

The current implementation of the VotingEscrow contract doesn't support fee on transfer tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some ERC20 tokens implemented so a fee is taken when transferring them, for example STA and PAXG. The current implementation of the VotingEscrow contract will mess up the accounting of the locked amounts if token will be a token like that, what will lead...

sendToCosmos doesn't consider the ERC20 transfer fee, resulting in incorrect amount of ERC20 token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some ERC tokens have a fee on each transfer. The protocol doesn’t handle the fee when transferring this kind of ERC20 tokens, leading to the inconsistent amount of token actually received in the contract. Validators on the Cudos will mint more tokens to...

You should use safe casts here

Judge @GalloDaSballo has assessed the 6th item in QA Report 254 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: … You should use safe casts here: depositspidmsg.sender.amount += uint192amount; depositspidmsg.sender.amount -= uint192amount; amount : uint192amount Otherwise, if token amounts are...

Linear vesting logic is incorrect for subsequent withdrawals

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After attempting a withdrawal, StakedCitadelVester.sol vest is called, creating a 21 day vesting schedule for the user to claim their withdrawed amount. This logic works perfectly for the first withdrawal, but will be incorrect for every subsequent...

SherlockClaimManager: Incorrect amounts needed and paid for escalated claims

Handle GreyArt Vulnerability details Impact When escalating claims, the documentation states that the protocol agent is required to pay and stake a certain amount for the process. If the covered protocol is proven correct, then the amount specified by the claim will be paid out. They will also...

startClaim() allows higher than covered amounts to submit claims

Handle GeekyLumberjack Vulnerability details Impact Allows claims that are higher than covered amounts. May cause unwanted results and confusion. Proof of Concept 1. Alice gets $100,000 in coverage 2. Alice changes coverage to $50,000 3. Alice call startClaim with amount set to $100,000 4. maxCla...