_amountOut is representing assets and shares at the same time in the liquidate function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the liquidate function from the Vault contract, the input argument amountOut is used as if it was representing a value of asset amount and share amount at the same time which is impossible a there a conversion rate between them, this error will make...

A malicious user can steal a reserved token by using shift() function of Well.sol if the well was added liquidity unsafely with zero amount of the one of tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A malicious user can steal a reserved token by using shift function of Well.sol if the well was added liquidity unsafely with zero amount of the one of tokens. Proof of Concept Let's assume the well with WETH and USDC tokens. Currently totalSupply is zer...

The calculateWithExactInput uses the same state's values for all transactions in the block

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The calculateWithExactInput uses the same state's values for all transactions. So all checks which should regulate swapped amounts will be broken. It can be a case of asset loss if there will be a significant amount of transactions in one block. Proof of...

Potential risk of using swappedAmount in case of swap error

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In case the swap operation failed, the module should continue as is with the erc20 conversion and finish the IBC transfer. This is the relevant part of the code that swallows the error: swappedAmount, err = k.coinswapKeeper.TradeInputForExactOutputctx,...

Doesn’t have proper slippage control.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact For risk management purposes, a swap will fail if the input coin amount exceeds a predefined limit. But it is not a slippage control. It doesn’t consider how many Canto a user wants to swap for. It is possible that the user will swap the token at a very...

M-05 Unmitigated

Lines of code Vulnerability details The mitigation makes accrueDrip is disable until the totalSupply 0. But the lastReport blocknumber is not updated. So all the dripped rewards still are collected by the first staker when the drip modifier is called at the second time. Impact If wxETH drips when...

Malicious code in fc-amount (npm)

--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: ghsa-malware deda6264abf52468856de6a91a887594ca7b427f7093f2486999d3323f096408 Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be...

MAL-2023-331 Malicious code in fc-amount (npm)

--- -= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=- Source: ghsa-malware deda6264abf52468856de6a91a887594ca7b427f7093f2486999d3323f096408 Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be...

Should check for _data.amount.value

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact msg.value is not checked in didPay, if swap is not successful, the eth amount sent back to the terminal is data.amount.value, which is provided by the user. If there is leftover eth in the contract, the fund could be stolen. Proof of Concept Some eth cou...

Rebalancing may overshoot

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A rebalance operation may overshoot, bringing the percentage outside the thresholds. Proof of Concept There are contractual limitations on the rebalance operations. It is assumed that these are put in place to ensure that the Rebalance Defender bot is no...

# riskFund.poolReserves return the token amount & its compaired with the USD value (units are not same)

Lines of code Vulnerability details riskFund.poolReserves return the token amount & its compaired with the USD value units are not same poolReserves in RiskFund.sol returns the token amount. But its compaired with the incentivizedRiskFundBalance which is in USD value. Proof of Concept 403 uint256...

bind security and bug fix update

32:9.16.23-11 - Correct backport issue in statistics rendering fix 2126912 32:9.16.23-10 - Handle subtle difference between upstream and rhel CVE-2022-3094 32:9.16.23-9 - Prevent flooding with UPDATE requests CVE-2022-3094 - Handle RRSIG queries when server-stale is active CVE-2022-3736 - Fix cra...

Unable to indicate negative amount in captial

Description Unable to indicate negative amount in captial Proof of Concept 1 Login application 2 Go to Capital Add Capital Fill in amount -999,999,999.00 3 The website indicate an negative amount...

InitialETHCrowdfund.batchContributeFor() doesn't refund for failed contributes

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact InitialETHCrowdfund.batchContributeFor doesn't refund for failed contributes when args.revertOnFailure is false. The funds will be locked in the initial crowdfund contract, so it should be refunded. Proof of Concept InitialETHCrowdfund.batchContributeFor...

OperatorProposal._executeOperation() should refund excess ETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There are excess ETH in OperatorProposal.executeOperation, and it should be refunded. Proof of Concept OperatorProposal.executeOperation runs data.operator.execute with data.operatorValue of ETH. data.operator.execute value: data.operatorValue...

Bond max-buyer might end up buying the max buy of the next epoch

Lines of code Vulnerability details The MuteBond.deposit function allows users to specify the amount of value they want to purchase bonds for or to set maxbuy to true. If maxbuy is set to true the amount specified in the value parameter is ignored and instead the maximum amount available for...

withdraw function of WstEth derivative contract probably sends wrong ETH amount back to owner contract/user

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Sends the wrong amount of ETH back to owner contract/user. In most cases, probably way too much, it sends the entire contract ETH balance. All the other calculations in the withdraw function seem correct, from what can be seen, but, as is the case with...

sfrxETH.ethPerDerivative is incorrect, leading to incorrect minting amount of safETH

Lines of code Vulnerability details SafeETH.stake allows users to stake ETH and be minted an amount of safETH that corresponds to the ETH value of the derivatives that resulted from their deposit. The minting amount is based on: preDepositPrice, which is a function of the total safETH minted and...

U.S. Cybersecurity Agency Raises Alarm Over Royal Ransomware's Deadly Capabilities

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA has released a new advisory about Royal ransomware, which emerged in the threat landscape last year. "After gaining access to victims' networks, Royal actors disable antivirus software and exfiltrate large amounts of data before...

OpenZeppelin 安全漏洞

OpenZeppelin is a software application. A standard for secure blockchain applications. A security vulnerability exists in OpenZeppelin Contracts that stems from an amount overflowing during transmission...