CVE-2021-44878

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm i.e., tokens with no signature, pac4j v5.3.0 and prior does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorit...

PT-2022-12251

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions pac4j versions 5.3.0 and prior pac4j versions 5.1 and earlier Description The issue concerns the support of the "none" algorithm by an OpenID Connect provider, which allows tokens with no signature. This algorithm does not require signature...

CVE-2021-44878: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature

If an OpenID Connect provider supports the "none" algorithm i.e., tokens with no signature, pac4j v5.3.0 and prior does not refuse it without an explicit configuration on its side or for the "idtoken" response type which is not secure and violates the OpenID Core Specification. The "none" algorit...

lockWithPermit() function allows for replay attacks and signature malleability

Handle jayjonah8 Vulnerability details Impact In XDEFIDistribution.sol the lockWithPermit function calls permit on the XDEFI token. The problem with simply using permit alone for this is the message that is signed by the owner using the ECDSA algorithm. The message only contains the receiver...

ENC DataVault Encryption Issues Vulnerabilities

Enc Security Enc DataVault is a solution from the Dutch company Enc Security. Turn any Usb drive into a secure removable disk for important files. ENC DataVault suffers from an encryption issue vulnerability that stems from ENC DataVault 7.1.1W using an incorrect encryption algorithm, which can b...

CVE-2021-42583

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

CVE-2021-42583

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

CVE-2021-42583

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

Design/Logic Flaw

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

CVE-2021-42583

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

CVE-2021-42583

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

CVE-2021-42583

Max Mazurov Maddy (github.com/foxcpp/maddy) is affected by a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm prior to version 0.5.2. The issue stems from the verify.go code-path in auth.shadow, where MD5-based hashing can lead to information disclosure. Multiple sources (CVE-2021-42583, GHSA-5R5W-H76P-M7...

CVE-2021-42583: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

A Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm exists in Max Mazurov Maddy before 0.5.2, which is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information...

CVE-2021-43550

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information, which affects the communications between Patient Information Center iX PIC iX Versions C.02 and C.03 and Efficia CM Series Revisions A.01 to C.0x and 4.0...

CVE-2021-43550

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information, which affects the communications between Patient Information Center iX PIC iX Versions C.02 and C.03 and Efficia CM Series Revisions A.01 to C.0x and 4.0...

Design/Logic Flaw

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information, which affects the communications between Patient Information Center iX PIC iX Versions C.02 and C.03 and Efficia CM Series Revisions A.01 to C.0x and 4.0...

CVE-2021-43550

The CVE-2021-43550 entry concerns the use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm in Philips PIC iX and Efficia CM Series. Connected sources (ICSMA-21-322-02) specify affected products: PIC iX versions C.02 and C.03 and Efficia CM Series revisions A.01 to C.0x and 4.0. The vulnerability enab...

CVE-2021-43550 Philips Patient Information Center iX (PIC iX) and Efficia CM Series Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information, which affects the communications between Patient Information Center iX PIC iX Versions C.02 and C.03 and Efficia CM Series Revisions A.01 to C.0x and 4.0...

PT-2021-23865

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Patient Information Center iX PIC iX versions C.02 through C.03 Efficia CM Series revisions A.01 through C.0x Efficia CM Series version 4.0 Description The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm poses an unnecessary risk, potentially...

CVE-2021-43550: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm

The use of a broken or risky cryptographic algorithm is an unnecessary risk that may result in the exposure of sensitive information, which affects the communications between Patient Information Center iX PIC iX Versions C.02 and C.03 and Efficia CM Series Revisions A.01 to C.0x and 4.0...