Lucene search
+L

18033 matches found

NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/06 8:17 p.m.•8 views

CVE-2026-104632

Gitea Actions blocks the jobs of workflow runs from first-time fork pull request contributors until a maintainer approves the run. The rerun path only required a run to be finished and built the new attempt's jobs without considering the pending approval, so when a user with Actions write access...

8.8CVSS0.00283EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
NVD
NVD
•added 2026/10/06 8:17 p.m.•9 views

CVE-2026-103670

When a Gitea Actions run was inserted, older runs in the same workflow-level concurrency group were cancelled without checking whether the new run still needed approval. Because fork pull request runs are inserted under the base repository, a user who can open a pull request from a fork could...

7.5CVSS0.00215EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Kitploit
Kitploit
•added 2026/10/06 7:55 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2025-66478-Exploit-Poc

Next.js CVE-2025-66478 PoC 英文 | 韩文 此仓库包含用于重现和研究 Next.js CVE-2025-66478 漏洞的概念验证 PoC。它由一个易受攻击的 Next.js 应用程序和一个用于测试漏洞的 Python 利用脚本组成。 什么是 CVE-2025-66478? 这是一个在 Next.js Server Actions 处理过程中发生的远程代码执行 RCE 漏洞。 关键要点: 根本原因 :RSC(React Server Components)Flight 协议中的不安全反序列化 。 攻击向量 :通过 proto 属性进行原型污染 。 漏洞摘要 项目...

7.8AI score
SaveExploits113References3
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•5 views

CVE-2026-96580 Gitea Actions memory exhaustion through large static matrices

Gitea expanded a workflow's static strategy.matrix into its full Cartesian product without a size limit when creating a run, before the fork pull request approval gate applied. A user who can open a pull request from a fork could submit a small workflow file whose matrix expands to a very large...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0References6
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-96580

The Gitea Actions service is vulnerable to memory exhaustion because it expands a workflow's static strategy.matrix into a full Cartesian product without a size limit during run creation. This occurs before the fork pull request approval gate is applied, allowing a user with permission to open a ...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score0.0035EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•8 views

CVE-2026-96580 Gitea Actions memory exhaustion through large static matrices

Gitea expanded a workflow's static strategy.matrix into its full Cartesian product without a size limit when creating a run, before the fork pull request approval gate applied. A user who can open a pull request from a fork could submit a small workflow file whose matrix expands to a very large...

5.9AI score0.0035EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•41 views

CVE-2026-96580 Gitea Actions memory exhaustion through large static matrices

Gitea expanded a workflow's static strategy.matrix into its full Cartesian product without a size limit when creating a run, before the fork pull request approval gate applied. A user who can open a pull request from a fork could submit a small workflow file whose matrix expands to a very large...

0.0035EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•14 views

CVE-2026-94205

A flaw in Gitea Actions allows for an approval bypass when handling fork pull requests. The system incorrectly determines if a workflow run requires approval by checking the identity of the user who triggered the event (e.g., a maintainer adding a label during triage) rather than the pull request...

9.8CVSS5.8AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-94205 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through maintainer-triggered events

Gitea Actions decided whether a fork pull request run needed approval based on the user who triggered the event rather than the pull request author. For pullrequest activity triggered by a maintainer during ordinary triage, such as adding a label, the run was created without requiring approval,...

9.8CVSS5.8AI score
SaveExploits0References6
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•37 views

CVE-2026-94205 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through maintainer-triggered events

Gitea Actions decided whether a fork pull request run needed approval based on the user who triggered the event rather than the pull request author. For pullrequest activity triggered by a maintainer during ordinary triage, such as adding a label, the run was created without requiring approval,...

0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•9 views

EUVD-2026-93919

Gitea Actions decided whether a fork pull request run needed approval based on the user who triggered the event rather than the pull request author. For pullrequest activity triggered by a maintainer during ordinary triage, such as adding a label, the run was created without requiring approval,...

5.8AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/10/06 7:25 p.m.•7 views

CVE-2026-94205 Gitea fork workflow approval bypass through maintainer-triggered events

Gitea Actions decided whether a fork pull request run needed approval based on the user who triggered the event rather than the pull request author. For pullrequest activity triggered by a maintainer during ordinary triage, such as adding a label, the run was created without requiring approval,...

5.8AI score0.00336EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•8 views

EUVD-2026-93913

Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git's own consistency checks reject. Gitea's web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while git checkout, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff...

5.8AI score0.00292EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•8 views

CVE-2026-95106 Gitea review and execution mismatch through duplicate tree entries

Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git's own consistency checks reject. Gitea's web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while git checkout, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff...

9.1CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0References6
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•44 views

CVE-2026-95106 Gitea review and execution mismatch through duplicate tree entries

Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git's own consistency checks reject. Gitea's web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while git checkout, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff...

0.00292EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•6 views

CVE-2026-95106 Gitea review and execution mismatch through duplicate tree entries

Gitea accepted pushed Git trees containing two entries with the same name, which Git's own consistency checks reject. Gitea's web views resolved such a path to the first entry, while git checkout, Gitea Actions, and release archives use the last. A contributor could open a pull request whose diff...

5.8AI score0.00292EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
OSV
OSV
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•4 views

CVE-2026-103670 Gitea trusted workflow cancellation by unapproved fork runs

When a Gitea Actions run was inserted, older runs in the same workflow-level concurrency group were cancelled without checking whether the new run still needed approval. Because fork pull request runs are inserted under the base repository, a user who can open a pull request from a fork could...

7.5CVSS5.9AI score
SaveExploits0References6
EUVD
EUVD
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•8 views

EUVD-2026-93911

When a Gitea Actions run was inserted, older runs in the same workflow-level concurrency group were cancelled without checking whether the new run still needed approval. Because fork pull request runs are inserted under the base repository, a user who can open a pull request from a fork could...

5.9AI score0.00215EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
CVE
CVE
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•11 views

CVE-2026-103670

The Gitea actions system is vulnerable to unauthorized workflow cancellation. When a new actions run is inserted into a concurrency group with cancel-in-progress enabled, the system cancels older runs without verifying if the new run requires approval. Because fork pull request runs are inserted ...

5.9AI score0.00215EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2026/10/06 7:23 p.m.•38 views

CVE-2026-103670 Gitea trusted workflow cancellation by unapproved fork runs

When a Gitea Actions run was inserted, older runs in the same workflow-level concurrency group were cancelled without checking whether the new run still needed approval. Because fork pull request runs are inserted under the base repository, a user who can open a pull request from a fork could...

0.00215EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder