CVE-2022-3260

The response header has not enabled X-FRAME-OPTIONS, Which helps prevents against Clickjacking attack.. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks...

PT-2022-21400 · Red Hat · Openshift

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: No specific software or versions are mentioned. Description: The issue is related to the absence of the X-FRAME-OPTIONS header in response headers, which helps prevent Clickjacking attacks. Without this header, some browsers may interpret the...

CVE-2022-3260

The response header has not enabled X-FRAME-OPTIONS, Which helps prevents against Clickjacking attack.. Some browsers would interpret these results incorrectly, allowing clickjacking attacks...

Authorization Bypass

notrinos/notrinos-erp is vulnerable to authorization bypass.The vulnerability exists because the x-frame-options are not properly restricted which allows an attacker to delete user account from the admin account...

Clickjacking Leads To User Deletion

Hello team, on notrinoserp there is no clickjacking protection implemented x-frame-options, so an attacker can perform clickjacking attack, and in this case im able to delete user account via this vulnerability from the admin account, here is the POC: Exploit Script: iframe position:relative;...

clickjacking attack

Description clickjacking bug.\ I see there is no x-frame-options header set . So, the erp url can be loaded in iframe tag . which allow clickjacking attack Proof of Concept same this bellow code in html file and open this html url is browser . STUDY METERIAL...

Rockwell Automation MicroLogix Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames (CVE-2022-2179)

The X-Frame-Options header in Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 Versions 21.007 and prior is not configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks. This plugin only works with Tenable.ot. Please visit https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-ot for more information. C...

CVE-2022-2179

The X-Frame-Options header in Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 Versions 21.007 and prior is not configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks...

Design/Logic Flaw

The X-Frame-Options header in Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 Versions 21.007 and prior is not configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks...

CVE-2022-2179

CVE-2022-2179 affects Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 (versions 21.007 and prior) where the X-Frame-Options header is not configured in HTTP responses, enabling potential clickjacking. The ICS advisory ICSA-22-188-01 confirms affected devices and a CVSS v3 base score of 6.5 (NETWORK, LOW...

CVE-2022-2179 ICSA-22-188-01 Rockwell Automation MicroLogix Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

The X-Frame-Options header in Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 Versions 21.007 and prior is not configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks...

CVE-2022-2179: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames

The X-Frame-Options header in Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 Versions 21.007 and prior is not configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks...

Security Bulletin: IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is vulnerable to Clickjacking when X-Frame-Options, Content-Security-Policy headers are not included in the HTTP response.(CVE-2021-29865)

Summary Summary guidance: - The Jazz Team Server is vulnerable to Clickjacking. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-29865 DESCRIPTION: IBM Jazz Foundation could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote...

PT-2022-4950

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Rockwell Automation MicroLogix 1100/1400 versions 21.007 and prior Description The issue is related to the X-Frame-Options header not being configured in the HTTP response, which could allow clickjacking attacks. This could enable a remote...

UI REDRESSING

Description The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. Proof of Concept Go to this URL:...

Rocket.Chat: Clickjacking at open.rocket.chat

The open.rocket.chat instance was found to have a misconfiguration issue with the "X-FRAME-OPTIONS" header, which could have allowed for clickjacking attacks. The issue was acknowledged and accepted by the Rocket.Chat team. However, they no longer accept vulnerability reports for their clients or...

Jenkins REST APIs vulnerable to clickjacking

Jenkins 2.218 and earlier, LTS 2.204.1 and earlier does not serve the X-Frame-Options: deny HTTP header on REST API responses to protect against clickjacking attacks. An attacker could exploit this by routing the victim through a specially crafted web page that embeds a REST API endpoint in an...

UI REDRESSING

Description The web application does not restrict or incorrectly restricts frame objects or UI layers that belong to another application or domain, which can lead to user confusion about which interface the user is interacting with. Proof of Concept Go to this URL:...

lemlist: Clickjacking at app.lemlist.com

Hi team, While performing security testing of your website i have found the vulnerability called Clickjacking. Many URLS are in scope and vulnerable to Clickjacking. What is Clickjacking ? Clickjacking User Interface redress attack, UI redress attack, UI redressing is a malicious technique of...

GHSA-W525-W93J-RXGM Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in Apache ActiveMQ

The web-based administration console in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.13.2 does not send an X-Frame-Options HTTP header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains a 1 FRAME or 2 IFRAME element...