4549 matches found
CVE-2016-7971
The SUSE advisory SUSE-SU-2016:3107-1 fixes libass vulnerabilities CVE-2016-7969, CVE-2016-7970, CVE-2016-7971, and CVE-2016-7972 by upgrading libass to the latest version (>= 0.13.4). The linked Nessus/Gentoo entries corroborate multiple vulnerabilities in libass with memory allocation issues...
CVE-2016-7971
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-6251
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-6251
CVE-2016-6251 was withdrawn (DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER); it does not represent an active vulnerability entry. Connected sources show that Mageia’s MGASA-2017-0024 documents CVE-2016-6251 alongside CVE-2016-6252, indicating shadow-utils-4.2.1 had potentially unsafe getlogin usage and an int...
CVE-2016-7293
CVE-2016-7293 is rejected/not used; the CNA withdrew it and it does not represent a security issue.
CVE-2017-6000
REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2016-6277. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2016-6277 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental...
CVE-2016-582384
CVE-2016-582384 is rejected and not used; it does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
CVE-2016-9302
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-9301
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-9300
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-8601
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in a "generally available" software product. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue in a "generally available" software product. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-8601
This CVE entry is rejected and not used.
CVE-2016-1000105
REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-7901
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...