6979 matches found
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
Mozilla: Sandboxed iframes were able to bypass sandbox restrictions to open a new window
The Mozilla Foundation Security Advisory describes this flaw as: By tricking the browser with a X-Frame-Options header, a sandboxed iframe could have presented a button that, if clicked by a user, would bypass restrictions to open a new window...
CVE-2024-38395
In iTerm2 before 3.5.2, the "Terminal may report window title" setting is not honored, and thus remote code execution might occur but "is not trivially exploitable."...
CVE-2024-38395
In iTerm2 versions prior to 3.5.2 , the "Terminal may report window title" setting is not honored, which could potentially lead to remote code execution . Although the vulnerability is noted as not trivially exploitable , it poses a significant security risk. To remediate this issue, users should...
CVE-2024-38395
In iTerm2 before 3.5.2, the "Terminal may report window title" setting is not honored, and thus remote code execution might occur but "is not trivially exploitable."...
CVE-2024-38395
In iTerm2 before 3.5.2, the "Terminal may report window title" setting is not honored, and thus remote code execution might occur but "is not trivially exploitable."...
CVE-2024-38395
In iTerm2 before 3.5.2, the "Terminal may report window title" setting is not honored, and thus remote code execution might occur but "is not trivially exploitable."...
CVE-2024-38395: Improper Control of Generation of Code
In iTerm2 before 3.5.2, the "Terminal may report window title" setting is not honored, and thus remote code execution might occur but "is not trivially exploitable."...
iTerm2 Security Vulnerability
iTerm2 is a terminal emulation program written for Mac OS X. A security vulnerability in iTerm2 version 3.5.x prior to 3.5.2, which originates from the unfiltered use of escape sequences to report window titles, allows an attacker to inject arbitrary code into the terminal...
Updated vte packages fix security vulnerability
GNOME VTE before 0.76.3 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service memory consumption via a window resize escape sequence, a related issue to CVE-2000-0476. CVE-2024-37535...