CVE-2025-31366

An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation vulnerability CWE-79 vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiProxy 7.4 all...

CVE-2025-22258

A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiSRA 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, FortiPAM 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0...

CVE-2025-22258

A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiSRA 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, FortiPAM 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, 7.4.0 through 7.4.6, 7.2.0...

CVE-2025-22258

CVE-2025-22258 is a heap-based buffer overflow affecting Fortinet products: FortiSRA (versions 1.5.0, 1.4.0–1.4.2), FortiPAM (1.5.0, 1.4.0–1.4.2, 1.3.0–1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0–1.1.2, 1.0.0–1.0.3), FortiProxy (7.6.0–7.6.1, 7.4.0–7.4.7), FortiOS (7.6.0–7.6.2, 7.4.0–7.4.6, 7.2.0–7.2.10, 7.0.2–7.0.16), a...

CVE-2025-49201

CVE-2025-49201 concerns Fortinet FortiPAM (versions 1.0.0–1.5.0) and FortiSwitchManager (7.2.0–7.2.4). Multiple sources confirm a weak authentication mechanism that enables an attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands by sending specially crafted HTTP requests, i.e., remote code execution...

CVE-2025-49201

A weak authentication vulnerability in Fortinet FortiPAM 1.5.0, FortiPAM 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands...

CVE-2025-58324

FortiSIEM is affected by CVE-2025-58324 in versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.1 all versions, 7.0 all versions, and 6.x all versions. The issue is an improper neutralization of input during web page generation (CWE-79) that may allow an authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross-site scripting...

CVE-2025-47856

Two improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command 'OS Command Injection' vulnerabilities CWE-78 in Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and before 6.4.10 allows a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP/HTTPS or CLI requests...

CVE-2025-47856

Two improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command 'OS Command Injection' vulnerabilities CWE-78 in Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and before 6.4.10 allows a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP/HTTPS or CLI requests...

Description of the security update for SharePoint Server 2019: October 14, 2025 (KB5002796)

None None...

CVE-2025-47856

Two improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command 'OS Command Injection' vulnerabilities CWE-78 in Fortinet FortiVoice version 7.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and before 6.4.10 allows a privileged attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via crafted HTTP/HTTPS or CLI requests...

CVE-2025-47856

Fortinet FortiVoice is affected by an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) caused by improper neutralization of specific elements. Impacted versions include FortiVoice 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 7.2.0 with pre-6.4.10. An authenticated or privileged attacker could potentially execute arbitrary...

Fortinet FortiSwitchManager和Fortinet FortiPAM 安全漏洞

FortiPAM is Fortinet's privileged access management solution for centralized management of sensitive enterprise credentials. A security vulnerability exists in Fortinet FortiPAM that stems from an insufficiently strong authentication mechanism. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to execu...

Fortinet FortiVoice 操作系统命令注入漏洞

FortiVoice is Fortinet's all-in-one enterprise voice over IP communications system. A command injection vulnerability exists in the Fortinet FortiVoice operating system that stems from improper neutralization of specific elements. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to construct a...

Fortinet FortiOS和Fortinet FortiProxy 授权问题漏洞

Fortinet FortiOS is a network operating system developed by Fortinet for use in its firewall and network security appliances. A security vulnerability exists in Fortinet FortiOS that stems from a flaw in the authorization mechanism. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to access static fil...

PT-2025-41862

A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V1 family incl. SIPLUS variants All versions V2.0.3, SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V2 family incl. SIPLUS variants All versions V2.0.3. The web server interface of affected devices improperly processes incoming malformed HTTP traffic at high rate...

PT-2025-41967

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Fortinet FortiADC versions 7.4.0, 7.2.3 and below, 7.1.4 and below, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions Description An issue exists in Fortinet FortiADC that may allow an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive data via crafted HTTP or HTTPS...

Fortinet FortiADC 信息泄露漏洞

FortiADC is an application delivery controller from Fortinet designed to optimize application performance, provide load balancing and enhance security. FortiADC suffers from a security vulnerability that stems from the program's failure to provide adequate access control for sensitive data access...

HCL Unica Campaign 安全漏洞

HCL Unica Campaign is a marketing campaign management solution from HCL India. A security vulnerability exists in HCL Unica Campaign version 12.1.10, which originates from malicious script injection in HTTP requests and could lead to reflective cross-site scripting attacks...

PT-2025-41750

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions HCL Unica Campaign version 12.1.10 Description The software is susceptible to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting XSS. An attacker can inject malicious script into an HTTP request. This script is then reflected unsafely in the server's response to...