SmartAccount authorization can be bypassed using a contract signature

Lines of code Vulnerability details SmartAccount authorization can be bypassed using a contract signature The SmartAccount wallet supports contract signatures defined by EIP1271, similar to how Gnosis Safe does. Transactions to the wallet can be authorized by a contract that implements the...

Frontrunning of smart wallet deployment

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. An attacker could obtain information about the owner and 'index' parameters to front-run the deployment of a smart wallet. Proof of Concept Provide direct links to all referenced code in GitHub. Add...

SmartAccount wallet creation can be backdoored

Lines of code Vulnerability details At wallet creation time, an attacker can temporarily swap the address of the entrypoint to install a backdoor in the form of a registered module in the wallet. Since wallets don't necessarily need to be created by their owners, an attacker can frontrun the wall...

An attacker can create a smart contract wallet with a malicious config and the address that the user expects his smart contract to have

Lines of code Vulnerability details Issue A deployCounterFactualWallet function in the SmartAccountFactory.sol uses create2 command to deploy a smart contract wallet with the address that can be computed before a transaction. A problem with the function is that it doesn't include the config...

Attacker can gain control of counterfactual wallet

Lines of code Vulnerability details A counterfactual wallet can be used by pre-generating its address using the SmartAccountFactory.getAddressForCounterfactualWallet function. This address can then be securely used for example, sending funds to this address knowing in advance that the user will...

Deny of service in SmartAccountFactory

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The salt used for create2 does not include information from the init method, so it is vulnerable to front-running. Proof of Concept it's impossible to override an existing contract in Ethereum. From EIP-684: If a contract creation is attempted, due to...

BitKeep Confirms Cyber Attack, Loses Over $9 Million in Digital Currencies

Decentralized multi-chain crypto wallet BitKeep on Wednesday confirmed a cyber attack that allowed threat actors to distribute fraudulent versions of its Android app with the goal of stealing users' digital currencies. "With maliciously implanted code, the altered APK led to the leak of user's...

## MALICIOUS OWNER CAN CLOSE AND WITHDRAW AS HE WANT

Lines of code Vulnerability details MALICIOUS OWNER CAN CLOSE AND WITHDRAW AS HE WANT These functions below are set some emergency scenarios. But caviar.Owner able to triggered these functions as he want. Need to set some require statement in order to actually check these scenarios before his...

Use safeTransferFrom instead of transferFrom for ERC721 transfers

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the contract VRFNFTRandomDraw.sol every transfer of ERC721 are done with the transferFrom instead of the recommended safeTransferFrom. This transferFrom does not check whether the receiver is capable of proper handling of NFTs. Proof of Concept If the...

Infinite approval given to DepositTradeHelper contract can be misused by malicious actors

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact depositAndTrade function in DepositTradeHelper account has infinite approval to spend baseTokens & collateralTokens of user using offChain signatures. However, once swapRouter executes UniV3 swap transaction on line 33, the contract does not give up its...

Hiro: Security Issue into Wallet lock protection

Description While testing wallet extension i generally try to test multiple endpoints, so 2 tabs were open of wallet on chrome-extension://ldinpeekobnhjjdofggfgjlcehhmanlj/popup.html So i tried to lock Wallet extension buti found that i can still use browser in 2nd tab, why i had already locked...

CVE-2022-3995

The TeraWallet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 1.4.3. This is due to insufficient validation of the user-controlled key on the lockunlockterawallet AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with...

CVE-2022-3995

The TeraWallet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 1.4.3. This is due to insufficient validation of the user-controlled key on the lockunlockterawallet AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with...

CVE-2022-3995 TeraWallet – For WooCommerce <= 1.4.3 - Insecure Direct Object Reference

The TeraWallet plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 1.4.3. This is due to insufficient validation of the user-controlled key on the lockunlockterawallet AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with...

Upgraded Q -> M from #16 [1669734774225]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 16 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: AQ6: This function provides too much power to Dao, if the dao calls the function, then he can be the node runner of each smart wallet and then call withdrawETHForKnot to drain each smart wallet. --- The text was updat...

fee distribution is only for the msg.to contract, instead of the to address of the call traces, which is not reasonable for the gas economic system.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The target contract of the fee distribution is got by contract := msg.To in the evmhooks.go . So the fee distribution is only for the msg.to contract, instead of the to address of the call traces. It means that any one use a contract wallet or setup a...

Incorrect revenue calculation will lead to revenue theft through proxy attacks

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The incorrect way revenue is calculated can lead to CSR being stolen through proxy attacks, which is likely to lead the ecology into CSR bribery war. Eventually, this feature will translate into reduced gas fees for all transactions, regardless of whethe...

Medium: Attacker may withdraw arbitrary amount from smart wallet, even if state checks would not normally allow it

Lines of code Vulnerability details Description withdrawETHForKnot in LiquidStakingManager suffers from reentrancy attack. function withdrawETHForKnotaddress recipient, bytes calldata blsPublicKeyOfKnot external requirerecipient != address0, "Zero address";...

withdrawETHForKnot is vulnerable to reentrancy attack

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The withdrawETHForKnot is vulnerable to reentrancy because the transfer is done before an important state change. Proof of Concept function withdrawETHForKnotaddress recipient, bytes calldata blsPublicKeyOfKnot external requirerecipient != address0, "Zer...

Trust Wallet Launches Browser Extension Wallet for Desktop

By Deeba Ahmed The extension will support all EVM chains and Solana. This is a post from HackRead.com Read the original post: Trust Wallet Launches Browser Extension Wallet for Desktop...