13 matches found
Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google Inc. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 had a vulnerability related to input validation. This vulnerability stemmed from insufficient input validation in the Media component, which could allow remote attackers who have breached the...
Google Chrome 安全漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google Inc. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 contained a security vulnerability. This vulnerability stemmed from improper implementation of the file input feature, which could allow remote attackers to exploit UI deception through...
Google Chrome 安全漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google Inc. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 contained a security vulnerability. This vulnerability stemmed from insufficient trusted input validation in Dialog. It could allow remote attackers with access to the renderer process to...
Google Chrome 安全漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google Inc. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 contained a security vulnerability. This vulnerability stemmed from insufficient input validation in TabGroups, which could allow remote attackers to exploit UI deception through malicious...
Google Chrome 安全漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google Inc. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 148.0.7778.96 contained a security vulnerability. This vulnerability stemmed from insufficient execution of WebApp policies, which could allow remote attackers to execute UI deception through specially...
Google Chrome 安全漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by the American company Google. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 contained a security vulnerability due to a policy bypass in Blink, which could lead to UI deception through specially crafted HTML pages...
Google Chrome 安全漏洞
Google Chrome is a web browser developed by Google Inc. Versions of Google Chrome prior to 145.0.7632.45 contained a security vulnerability, which was caused by improper handling of file inputs. This vulnerability could potentially lead users to execute certain UI gestures, resulting in UI...
Content Spoofing
org.wso2.identity.apps:authentication-portal is vulnerable to Content Spoofing. The vulnerability is due to improper handling and validation of error messages passed through URL parameters, which allows an attacker to inject arbitrary content into the user interface and deceive users through...
The vulnerability of the Downloads component in Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge browsers allows attackers to carry out spear-phishing attacks.
The vulnerability of the Downloads component in Google Chrome and Microsoft Edge is related to the false representation of critical information to the user’s interface. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow a remote attacker to perform spear-phishing attacks...
The vulnerability of Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Firefox ESR browsers relates to the false representation of critical information on the user interface, allowing attackers to compromise the integrity of protected information.
The vulnerability of Mozilla Firefox and Mozilla Firefox ESR browsers is related to the false representation of critical information to the user interface. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow an attacker to influence the integrity of the protected information...
CVE-2022-20271
In PermissionController, there is a possible way to grant some permissions without user consent due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.Product:...
VulnCheck KEV: CVE-2020-15654
When in an endless loop, a website specifying a custom cursor using CSS could make it look like the user is interacting with the user interface, when they are not. This could lead to a perceived broken state, especially when interactions with existing browser dialogs and warnings do not work. Thi...
UBUNTU-CVE-2020-15654
When in an endless loop, a website specifying a custom cursor using CSS could make it look like the user is interacting with the user interface, when they are not. This could lead to a perceived broken state, especially when interactions with existing browser dialogs and warnings do not work. Thi...