Lucene search
+L

130 matches found

attackerkb
attackerkb
•added 2018/05/01 6:29 p.m.•5 views

CVE-2018-9232

Due to the lack of firmware authentication in the upgrade process of T&W WIFI Repeater BE126 devices, an attacker can craft a malicious firmware and use it as an update...

9.3CVSS5.5AI score0.01163EPSS
SaveExploits1References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2018/05/01 6:29 p.m.•29 views

CVE-2018-9232

Due to the lack of firmware authentication in the upgrade process of T&W WIFI Repeater BE126 devices, an attacker can craft a malicious firmware and use it as an update...

9.3CVSS7.7AI score0.01163EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2018/05/01 6:00 p.m.•28 views

CVE-2018-9232

Due to the lack of firmware authentication in the upgrade process of T&W WIFI Repeater BE126 devices, an attacker can craft a malicious firmware and use it as an update...

7.7AI score0.01163EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2018/05/01 6:00 p.m.•53 views

CVE-2018-9232

CVE-2018-9232 affects Gongjin Electronics’ T&W WIFI Repeater BE126. The connected CNVD entry confirms a vulnerability caused by failure to authenticate firmware during the upgrade process, enabling an attacker to craft malicious firmware and install it as an update. No explicit fixes are listed i...

9.3CVSS7.6AI score0.01163EPSS
SaveExploits1References1Affected Software1
Citrix
Citrix
•added 2018/04/17 12:00 a.m.•16 views

After I upgrade Windows 10 on my OS layer, what do I do about the C:\Windows.old folder?

When you upgrade Windows 10 from one major version to another 1703 to 1709, for instance, the previous Windows installation is left in a C:\Windows.old folder. In App Layering, you must not delete this folder. Our software needs to copy our drivers and other files from Windows.old to Windows once...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Citrix
Citrix
•added 2018/03/16 12:00 a.m.•18 views

FAQ: NetScaler SD-WAN Installation and Upgrade

Q: Can I downgrade a NetScaler SD-WAN 4000/5000 appliance to an earlier software release? A : A NetScaler SD-WAN 4000/5000 appliance cannot be downgraded to an earlier release.The appliance should have to be factory reset and provisioned again from scratch. For example, if an appliance is running...

7.4AI score
SaveExploits0
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2018/03/12 12:00 a.m.•9 views

Mitochrome upgrade process has an arbitrary file download vulnerability

Meitu Xiu Xiu is a photo manipulation software. Mito Xiu Xiu in the upgrade process exists arbitrary file download vulnerability, due to the program in the update process does not use any encryption algorithms, the query domain name does not exist any checksum mechanism, the new version of the...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Citrix
Citrix
•added 2017/12/30 12:00 a.m.•17 views

FAQ: Single-Step Upgrade for SD-WAN Appliances to 9.3.x

Question: Should I use .tar.gz, or single step upgrade .zip package to upgrade to 9.3.x from my current version 8.1.x, 9.1.x, 9.2.x? Answer: Use the .tar.gz files of the concerned platforms to upgrade the SD-WAN software to 9.3.x. After the SD-WAN software is upgraded to 9.3.x version, perform...

7.1AI score
SaveExploits0
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2017/11/21 12:00 a.m.•18 views

Cisco Spark Board Local Security Bypass Vulnerability

Cisco Spark Board is a dedicated tablet device for video conferencing from Cisco. A local security bypass vulnerability exists in the upgrade process in Cisco Spark Board, which arises from the program failing to adequately validate the upgrade package. A local attacker could exploit the...

4.4CVSS6.5AI score0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Prion
Prion
•added 2017/11/16 7:29 a.m.•22 views

Security feature bypass

A vulnerability in the upgrade process of Cisco Spark Board could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install an unverified upgrade package, aka Signature Verification Bypass. The vulnerability is due to insufficient upgrade package validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability b...

2.1CVSS4.6AI score0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2017/11/16 7:29 a.m.•18 views

CVE-2017-12306

A vulnerability in the upgrade process of Cisco Spark Board could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install an unverified upgrade package, aka Signature Verification Bypass. The vulnerability is due to insufficient upgrade package validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability b...

4.4CVSS5.8AI score0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
NVD
NVD
•added 2017/11/16 7:29 a.m.•22 views

CVE-2017-12306

A vulnerability in the upgrade process of Cisco Spark Board could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install an unverified upgrade package, aka Signature Verification Bypass. The vulnerability is due to insufficient upgrade package validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability b...

4.4CVSS4.6AI score0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
CVE
CVE
•added 2017/11/16 7:00 a.m.•61 views

CVE-2017-12306

The CVE concerns Cisco Spark Board: a local, authenticated attacker could bypass signature verification during the upgrade process due to insufficient upgrade package validation, enabling installation of a user-controlled, potentially custom firmware. This describes a local impact with the attack...

4.4CVSS4.6AI score0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2017/11/16 12:00 a.m.•3 views

PT-2017-12481

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions Cisco Spark Board affected versions not specified Description The issue is related to insufficient upgrade package validation in the upgrade process, allowing an authenticated, local attacker to install an unverified upgrade package. This coul...

4.4CVSS0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Cisco
Cisco
•added 2017/11/15 4:00 p.m.•75 views

Cisco Spark Board Upgrade Signature Verification Bypass Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the upgrade process of Cisco Spark Board could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install an unverified upgrade package. The vulnerability is due to insufficient upgrade package validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing the upgrade process wit...

4.4CVSS4.5AI score0.00193EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Citrix
Citrix
•added 2017/09/11 12:00 a.m.•18 views

How to Upgrade Receiver from StoreFront

Question: How to upgrade Receiver from StoreFront? Answer: 1. Go to C:\Program Files\Citrix\Receiver StoreFront\Receiver Clients\. Create a Windows folder if it doesn’t exist. 2. In the Windows folder, paste the Receiver for Windows with the version you want to set as the threshold, overwriting...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2016/12/29 12:00 a.m.•41 views

PT-2016-4567 · Php +3 · Phpmailer +3

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: PHPMailer versions prior to 5.2.20 Description: The issue is related to the isMail transport in PHPMailer, where improper interaction between the escapeshellarg function and internal escaping performed in the mail function in PHP might allow...

9.8CVSS7AI score0.99714EPSS
SaveExploits93References113
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2015/05/04 12:00 a.m.•15 views

Multiple F5 Products Certificate Validation Forgery Spoofing Vulnerability

F5 BIG-IP LTM is a local traffic manager; APM is a suite of solutions that provide secure unified access to business-critical applications and networks. A checksum forgery spoofing vulnerability exists in multiple F5 product certificates. Failure to properly validate the server certificate when t...

4.3CVSS6.5AI score0.00817EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Atlassian
Atlassian
•added 2014/05/22 12:50 p.m.•28 views

Upgrading to 5.5.1 from 5.4.3 didn't update xwork from 1.13 to 1.17

We recently upgraded our instance following your security advisory. It was discovered shortly after the upgrade that the xwork file that was vulnerable 1.13 was not upgraded to the safe version 1.17. This could have just been specific to our instance but you should check your upgrade process and...

3.3AI score
SaveExploits0
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus
•added 2013/01/24 12:00 a.m.•27 views

RHEL 3 / 4 : redhat-release (EOL Notice) (RHSA-2011:0002)

This is the End Of Life notification for RHN Proxy Server 4. On December 31st, 2010, per the life cycle support policy, the version 4 series of Satellite and Proxy products exited Production Phase 2 marking the end of their support by Red Hat. Please reference the support policy here :...

5.5AI score
SaveExploits0References6
Rows per page
Query Builder