8 matches found
EUVD-2025-7672
Malicious code in bioql PyPI...
CVE-2025-25566
Memory Leak vulnerability in SoftEtherVPN 5.02.5187 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the UnixMemoryAlloc function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because the behavior is limited to a single allocation of a few hundred bytes with a command-line tool...
CVE-2025-25566
Memory Leak vulnerability in SoftEtherVPN 5.02.5187 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the UnixMemoryAlloc function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because the behavior is limited to a single allocation of a few hundred bytes with a command-line tool...
CVE-2025-25566
Memory Leak vulnerability in SoftEtherVPN 5.02.5187 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the UnixMemoryAlloc function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because the behavior is limited to a single allocation of a few hundred bytes with a command-line tool...
CVE-2025-25566
A memory leak vulnerability exists in SoftEtherVPN version 5.02.5187 within the UnixMemoryAlloc function. This flaw could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS). However, the supplier disputes the severity, noting the behavior is limited to a single allocation of a few hundred bytes...
CVE-2025-25566
Memory Leak vulnerability in SoftEtherVPN 5.02.5187 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the UnixMemoryAlloc function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because the behavior is limited to a single allocation of a few hundred bytes with a command-line tool...
SoftEther VPN 安全漏洞
SoftEther VPN is a free and open source, cross-platform, multi-protocol VPN software from SoftEther Open Source. It is used to provide secure, flexible and efficient network connectivity that bypasses geographic restrictions. A security vulnerability exists in SoftEther VPN version 5.02.5187, whi...
CVE-2025-25566: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime
Memory Leak vulnerability in SoftEtherVPN 5.02.5187 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the UnixMemoryAlloc function. NOTE: the Supplier disputes this because the behavior is limited to a single allocation of a few hundred bytes with a command-line tool...