Ethereum blockchain security breach

Ethereum Blockchain is a decentralized open source public blockchain platform with smart contract capabilities from the Ethereum Foundation. A security vulnerability exists in Ethereum blockchain that stems from incorrect access control contained in UniswapFrontRunBot, which could lead to financi...

PT-2024-13403 · Unknown · Uniswapfrontrunbot

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: UniswapFrontRunBot version 0xdB94c Description: A vulnerability in UniswapFrontRunBot allows attackers to cause financial losses via unspecified vectors. Recommendations: At the moment, there is no information about a newer version that...

increaseLiquidity/decreaseLiquidity Lack of slippage protection

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability details In ParticlePositionManager.mint, there is slippage protection by params.amount0Min / params.amount1Min But in increaseLiquidity, pool.mint will also be executed There is no slippage protection function increaseLiquidity uint256 tokenId,...

LP owner cannot control slippage while managing their position

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The owner of the LP cannot specify the slippage parameters while interacting with this position in increaseLiquidity and decreaseLiquidity. Impact Liquidity interaction with Uniswap is protected by minimum amount parameters that control the slippage of...

lack of deadline for uniswap interactions

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of deadline can cause a transaction to be executed at an unfavorable time. Causing loss for the trader/liquidity provider. Proof of Concept In all three liquidity interactions with uniswap there is a lack of deadline parameter as block.timestamp is...

lack of slippage protection for increaseLiquidity, and decreaseLiquidity

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of slippage protection for increasing and decreasing liquidity can cause the liquidity provider to provide liquidity at an unfavorable price. Or the borrower to borrow/repay in a manipulated pool. Proof of Concept When adding liquidity eventually...

Incorrect fee calculation may lead to borrower overpaying

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Fees are incorrectly snapshotted when a new lien is created, potentially leading to a fee overpay. Impact The Particle LAMM protocol tracks fees using the same internal tracking built in Uniswap V3. Positions in Uniswap V3 contain a couple of variables...

Increase liquidity in close position may not cover original borrowed liquidity

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary When a position is closed, there is no check to ensure that the effective added liquidity covers the original borrowed liquidity from the LP. Impact Closing a position in the Particle LAMM protocol must ensure that the borrowed liquidity gets fully adde...

Dangerous use of deadline parameter

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The protocol is using block.timestamp as the deadline argument while interacting with the Uniswap NFT Position Manager, which completely defeats the purpose of using a deadline. Impact Actions in the Uniswap NonfungiblePositionManager contract are...

Liquidator has no incentives to execute a favorable trade to the borrower

Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary Swaps involved in liquidations may negatively impact the owner of the lien, since there is no incentive to execute a favorable trade as long as the received amount is enough to recover the liquidity. Impact When an existing position is closed, the...

Fee-on-transfer/rebasing tokens will have problems when swapping

Lines of code 110 Vulnerability details Uniswap v3 does not support rebasing or fee-on-transfer tokens so using these tokens with it will result funds getting stuck. With fee-on-transfer tokens, if the balance isn't checked, the wrong amount may be transferred out. With rebasing tokens, the...

Fee-on-transfer/rebasing tokens will have problems when swapping

Lines of code 110 Vulnerability details Uniswap v3 does not support rebasing or fee-on-transfer tokens so using these tokens with it will result funds getting stuck. With fee-on-transfer tokens, if the balance isn't checked, the wrong amount may be transferred out. With rebasing tokens, the...

Underflow could happened when calculating Uniswap V3 position's fee growth and can cause operations to revert

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When operations need to calculate Uniswap V3 position's fee growth, it used similar function implemented by uniswap v3. However, according to this known issue : Uniswap/v3-core573. The contract is implicitly relies on underflow/overflow when calculating...

Providing LP outside of active range is prone to DoS

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When LP provide uniswap V3 position using ParticlePositionManager that have range outside of active price, it can be DoSed by opening position of all the provided liquidity. Proof of Concept When LPs provide a Uniswap V3 position that is currently outsid...

Liquidation is not possible if trader blacklisted from blacklistable ERC20 token

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If a trader is blacklisted from a blacklistable ERC20 token while has an open position, it may not be possible to liquidate the position. Proof of Concept When liquidate position, it will eventually calculate the amount of token that need to be send to...

Fee-on-transfer/rebasing tokens will have problems when swapping

Lines of code 110 Vulnerability details Uniswap v3 does not support rebasing or fee-on-transfer tokens so using these tokens with it will result funds getting stuck. With fee-on-transfer tokens, if the balance isn't checked, the wrong amount may be transferred out. With rebasing tokens, the...

Interface improperly implemented

Lines of code 34, 34, 34, 34, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 38https://github.com/Tapioca-DAO/tapioca-yieldbox-strategies-audi...

Fee-on-transfer/rebasing tokens will have problems when swapping

Lines of code 110 Vulnerability details Impact Uniswap v3 does not support rebasing or fee-on-transfer tokens so using these tokens with it will result funds getting stuck. With fee-on-transfer tokens, if the balance isn't checked, the wrong amount may be transferred out. With rebasing tokens, th...

Deriving the price with balanceOf() is dangerous

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Deriving the price with balanceOf is dangerous as it can easily be manipulated by direct transfers. Proof of Concept In the getAssetDistributionData function, the asset lying in the LRTDepositPool is retrieved using balanceOfaddressthis:...

updateScore() is vulnerable to flashloan manipulation

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact vToken.balanceOfuser can be manipulated by dong some flash loan of vToken. Proof of Concept A flash loan attack is a type of exploit that takes advantage of the fact that flash loans are uncollateralized and do not require a credit check. In a flash loan...