Customers cannot redeem() LP tokens to non-EOA accounts

Lines of code Vulnerability details The use of payable.transfer is heavily frowned upon because it can lead to the locking of funds. The transfer call requires that the recipient has a payable callback, only provides 2300 gas for its operation. This means the following cases can cause the transfe...

curl 资源管理错误漏洞

curl is a tool used to transfer data from or to a server. A resource management error vulnerability exists in curl that stems from a logical error in the configuration matching feature that does not take into account IPv6 address region ids. This issue could cause curl to reuse the wrong connecti...

The vulnerability of the Juniper Networks Contrail Service Orchestration software lies in a failure of the protection mechanism in the REST API, which allows an attacker to disclose protected information.

The vulnerability of the Juniper Networks Contrail Service Orchestration software is related to a failure in the protection mechanism of the REST API. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow an attacker, operating remotely, to disclose the protected information...

function lockFunds in TopUpActionLibrary can cause serious fund lose. fee and Capped bypass. It's not calling stakerVault.increaseActionLockedBalance when transfers stakes.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In function TopUpActionLibrary.lockFunds when transfers stakes from payer it doesn't call stakerVault.increaseActionLockedBalance for that payer so stakerVault.actionLockedBalancespayer is not get updated for payer and...

Unlimited reward minting with Function Transfer in StakerVault (updates balances before calling userCheckpoint)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The bug in "StakerVault.transfer" function which is externally callable is that first it is updating the balance of sender and receiver then it calls ILpGaugelpGauge.userCheckpoint for those addresses. Function userCheckpoint use balance of address to...

User can steal all rewards due to checkpoint after transfer

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact I believe this to be a high severity vulnerability that is potentially included in the currently deployed StakerVault.sol contract also. The team will be contacted immediately following the submission of this report. In StakerVault.sol, the user...

Exploit for Path Traversal in Wso2 Api_Manager

nmap-CVE-2022-29464 nmap-CVE-2022-29464 is an NSE script for d...

Unsafe ERC20 transfer Operations

Findings Unsafe ERC20 transfer Operations The transfer and transferFrom functions return a Boolean value which should be checked for successful transfer, Some tokens do not revert if the transfer did fail but return false. the protocol Joyn do have some lines for code that make a use of these...

Don't ignore ERC20 transfer return values

You're ignoring the return value of an ERC20 transfer twice: Either use SafeERC20 or check the return value as you do in other places in the code base. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: All reactions...

use safe erc20 functions

ERC721Payable.handlePayment core-contracts/contracts/ERC721Payable.sol50-56 ignores return value by payableToken.transferFrom core-contracts/contracts/ERC721Payable.sol54 consider safeTransferFrom to prevent any locks or loss of funds --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors were...

Tokens with fee on transfer are not supported

Lines of code Vulnerability details There are ERC20 tokens that charge fee for every transfer / transferFrom. Vault.soladdValue assumes that the received amount is the same as the transfer amount, and uses it to calculate attributions, balance amounts, etc. But, the actual transferred amount can ...

Index managers can rug user funds

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The ORDERERROLE role has the ability to arbitrarily transfer user funds, and this role is shared between both the orderer and people who can rebalance the index. Even if the owner is benevolent the fact that there is a rug vector available may negatively...

Index mint and burn calls can be front run

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Both in the mint and burn cases all the user supplied / due to a user assets can be stolen by an attacker, who detects correspondingly asset transfer calls / Index token transfer call and front runs Index contract's mint / burn call with own address as a...

IndexLogic: An attacker can burn other users' tokens to transfer assets to himself

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the burn function of the IndexLogic contract, the user needs to transfer the tokens to the contract first, and then call the burn function to withdraw the assets. The attacker can monitor the number of tokens in the contract. When it is not 0, the...

IndexLogic: An attacker can mint tokens for himself using assets deposited by other users

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the mint function of the IndexLogic contract, users are required to transfer assets to vToken in advance, and then call the mint function to mint tokens. The attacker can monitor the asset balance in the vToken contract. When the balance is greater th...

The vulnerability of Siemens’ TFTP-server implementation for software and software-hardware products arises from the operation that goes beyond buffer boundaries in memory, allowing attackers to gain access to protected information.

The vulnerability of the TFTP server implementation for Siemens’ software and software-hardware products lies in the fact that the operation is carried out outside the buffer in memory. Exploiting this vulnerability allows a malicious actor to gain access to protected information by sending...

Code credits fee-on-transfer tokens for amount stated, not amount transferred

Lines of code Vulnerability details Some ERC20 tokens, such as Tether USDT, allow for charging a fee any time transfer or transferFrom is called. If a contract does not allow for amounts to change after transfers, asset calculations will be incorrect. While the planned tokens to be used may not...

The vulnerability of FTP servers for microprogrammed software controllers such as CAPITAL VSTAR, APOGEE MBC, APOGEE MEC, APOGEE PXC, TALON TC, and the operating system Nucleus allows a hacker to cause service failures or execute arbitrary codes.

The vulnerability of the FTP servers of the microprogrammed control devices CAPITAL VSTAR, APOGEE MBC, APOGEE MEC, APOGEE PXC, TALON TC, and the operating system Nucleus is related to errors during the verification of the USER command’s length. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow a remote...

The vulnerability of FTP servers for microprogrammed software controllers such as CAPITAL VSTAR, APOGEE MBC, APOGEE MEC, APOGEE PXC, TALON TC, and the operating system Nucleus allows a hacker to cause a service failure or execute arbitrary code.

The vulnerability of FTP servers for microprogrammed control devices such as CAPITAL VSTAR, APOGEE MBC, APOGEE MEC, APOGEE PXC, TALON TC, and the operating system Nucleus is related to errors during the verification of the MKD/XMKD command length. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow an attack...

earn can be called many times

Lines of code Vulnerability details earn can be called many times and each time more money will be transferred to the strategy, and the money in the strategy can be above the desired percentage of the money that should be in the strategy. --- The text was updated successfully, but these errors we...