No minOutAmount amount checks when buying

Lines of code Vulnerability details The tokenOutPrice can be changed with the setTokenOutPrice even if the sale is already running. Users might accept the current token price, send a purchase transaction, and before it is mined the token price can be un-intentionally changed. The user might recei...

CVE-2021-39044

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210...

CVE-2021-39044

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210...

CVE-2021-39066

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 does not invalidate session any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions. IBM X-Force ID: 215040...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210...

Session fixation

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 does not invalidate session any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions. IBM X-Force ID: 215040...

CVE-2021-39066

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 does not invalidate session any existing session identifier gives an attacker the opportunity to steal authenticated sessions. IBM X-Force ID: 215040...

CVE-2021-39066

Summary: CVE-2021-39066 affects IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services (multiplatform) version 3.2.4. The vulnerability arises because the product does not invalidate an existing session after certain events, enabling an attacker to hijack an authenticated session. This is documente...

CVE-2021-39044

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 214210...

CVE-2021-39044

IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services (Multiplatforms) 3.2.4 is vulnerable to Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF), enabling an attacker to execute malicious actions on behalf of a trusted user. The IBM security bulletin cites a CVSSv3.0 base score of 4.3 (VECTOR: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/P...

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 跨站请求伪造漏洞

IBM Financial Transaction Manager is a financial transaction manager from IBM Corporation in the United States. The product is primarily used to monitor, track and report on financial payments and transactions.IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery,...

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 授权问题漏洞

IBM Financial Transaction Manager is a financial transaction manager from IBM Corporation in the United States. The product is primarily used to monitor, track and report financial payments and transactions. IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 contains an authorization issue vulnerability tha...

Security Bulletin: Cross-site scripting and session fixation vulnerability in IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services

Summary Cross-site scripting and session fixation vulnerability in IBM Financial Transaction Manager for SWIFT Services Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-39044 DESCRIPTION: IBM Financial Transaction Manager is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute...

Unsecure oracle price

Handle 0x1f8b Vulnerability details Impact The oracle price use an unsecure calculation. Proof of Concept The contract Cvx3CrvOracle use the min price of dai, usdt and usdt instead of the average, so if an attacker is able to compromise the oracle end point, and change one of them, the contract...

require check doesnt comply with an underlying token that implemented fee in the transfer and transferFrom function

Handle Tomio Vulnerability details Impact The implementation for the transferAndCheckUnderlying function can revert the transaction if the underlying token is implementing a fee on the transfer and transferFrom function, this can happen because when a token implementing a fee on transfer, it...

Security Bulletin: Financial Transaction Manager is affected by a vulnerability in Apache log4j (CVE-2021-44228)

Summary A vulnerability was identified within the Apache Log4j library that is used by IBM Financial Transaction Manager to provide logging functionality. This vulnerability has been addressed. Vulnerability Details CVEID: CVE-2021-44228 DESCRIPTION: Apache Log4j could allow a remote attacker to...

Security Bulletin: Apache Log4j vulnerabilities impact z/Transaction Processing Facility (z/TPF) and TPF Operations Server (CVE-2021-45105, CVE-2021-45046)

Summary The Apache Log4j vulnerabilities affect the z/Transaction Processing Facility z/TPF system and TPF Operations Server. Several Java applications on the z/TPF system depend on Apache Log4j capabilities. Additionally, the 64-bit Java support in TPF Operations Server uses Apache Log4j...

Convenience contract fails to function if asset or collateral is an ERC20 token with fees

Handle Ruhum Vulnerability details Impact There are ERC20 tokens that collect fees with each transfer. If the asset or collateral used in a pair is of that type, the Convenience contract fails to function. It always sends the flat amount specified in the function's parameter. If the token collect...

GHSA-8GJM-H3XJ-MP6W RPC call failure in ckb

An issue was discovered in the ckb crate before 0.40.0 for Rust. A getblocktemplate RPC call may fail in situations where it is supposed to select a Nervos CKB blockchain transaction with a higher fee rate than another transaction...

RPC call failure in ckb

An issue was discovered in the ckb crate before 0.40.0 for Rust. A getblocktemplate RPC call may fail in situations where it is supposed to select a Nervos CKB blockchain transaction with a higher fee rate than another transaction...