Lucene search
+L

5505 matches found

Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
•added 2024/01/19 10:07 p.m.•35 views

SPV Merkle proof malleability allows the maintainer to prove invalid transactions

Summary By publishing specially crafted transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain, the SPV maintainer can produce seemingly valid SPV proofs for fraudulent transactions. The issue was originally identified by Least Authority in the tBTC Bridge V2 Security Audit Report as Issue B: Bitcoin SPV Merkle...

7.5AI score
SaveExploits0References7Affected Software1
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2024/01/19 12:00 a.m.•9 views

PT-2024-40497 · Bitcoin · Bitcoind

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Bitcoin affected versions not specified Description: The issue allows an attacker to create seemingly valid SPV proofs for fraudulent transactions by publishing specially crafted transactions on the Bitcoin blockchain. This is achieved by...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0References8
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2024/01/19 12:00 a.m.•16 views

Ethereum blockchain security breach

Ethereum Blockchain is a decentralized open source public blockchain platform with smart contract capabilities from the Ethereum Foundation. A security vulnerability exists in Ethereum blockchain that stems from the executeTransaction function in MultiSigWallet containing incorrect access control...

7.5CVSS6.7AI score0.00494EPSS
SaveExploits1References3
BDU FSTEC
BDU FSTEC
•added 2024/01/18 12:00 a.m.•15 views

The vulnerability of the HTTPS Transaction Handler component in the software for processing and transmitting confidential data of Progress MOVEit Transfer allows a attacker to trigger a service failure.

The vulnerability of the HTTPS Transaction Handler component in the software for processing and transmitting confidential data of Progress MOVEit Transfer is related to improper cleaning or release of resources. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow a malicious actor to cause service failures...

7.5CVSS7AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2024/01/17 3:56 p.m.•29 views

CVE-2024-0396 Missing Server-Side Input Validation in HTTP Parameter

In Progress MOVEit Transfer versions released before 2022.0.10 14.0.10, 2022.1.11 14.1.11, 2023.0.8 15.0.8, 2023.1.3 15.1.3, an input validation issue was discovered. An authenticated user can manipulate a parameter in an HTTPS transaction. The modified transaction could lead to computational...

7.1CVSS6.6AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2024/01/17 3:56 p.m.•53 views

CVE-2024-0396 Missing Server-Side Input Validation in HTTP Parameter

In Progress MOVEit Transfer versions released before 2022.0.10 14.0.10, 2022.1.11 14.1.11, 2023.0.8 15.0.8, 2023.1.3 15.1.3, an input validation issue was discovered. An authenticated user can manipulate a parameter in an HTTPS transaction. The modified transaction could lead to computational...

7.1CVSS6.9AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
CNNVD
CNNVD
•added 2024/01/17 12:00 a.m.•13 views

Progress MOVEit Transfer Input Validation Error Vulnerability

Progress MOVEit Transfer is a secure hosted file transfer application from Progress. An input validation error vulnerability exists in Progress MOVEit Transfer, which stems from the presence of an input validation issue that allows an authenticated user to manipulate parameters in an HTTPS...

7.1CVSS6.6AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References4
Positive Technologies
Positive Technologies
•added 2024/01/17 12:00 a.m.•13 views

PT-2024-1119 · Ipswitch · Moveit Transfer

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: MOVEit Transfer versions prior to 2022.0.10 14.0.10 MOVEit Transfer versions prior to 2022.1.11 14.1.11 MOVEit Transfer versions prior to 2023.0.8 15.0.8 MOVEit Transfer versions prior to 2023.1.3 15.1.3 Description: An input validation issue...

7.5CVSS6.6AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References10
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
Rapid7 Vulnerability Database (full)
•added 2024/01/17 12:00 a.m.•2 views

CVE-2024-0396: Improper Input Validation

In Progress MOVEit Transfer versions released before 2022.0.10 14.0.10, 2022.1.11 14.1.11, 2023.0.8 15.0.8, 2023.1.3 15.1.3, an input validation issue was discovered. An authenticated user can manipulate a parameter in an HTTPS transaction. The modified transaction could lead to computational...

7.1CVSS6.9AI score0.00539EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/01/12 5:46 p.m.•36 views

CLSA-2024-1705081601 Fix of 7 CVEs

CVE-url: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-7192 - netfilter: ctnetlink: fix possible refcount leak in ctnetlinkcreateconntrack CVE-url: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-6610 - smb: client: fix potential OOB in smb2dumpdetail CVE-url: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-6606 - smb: client:...

7.8CVSS6.7AI score0.00735EPSS
SaveExploits4References1
CNVD
CNVD
•added 2024/01/11 12:00 a.m.•54 views

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway Access Control Error Vulnerability

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway is a connector for modernizing enterprise CICS assets from International Business Machines IBM. An access control error vulnerability exists in IBM CICS Transaction Gateway version 9.3, which can be exploited by an attacker to transfer or view files...

8.1CVSS6.6AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Krebs on Security
Krebs on Security
•added 2024/01/10 1:39 p.m.•27 views

Here’s Some Bitcoin: Oh, and You’ve Been Served!

A California man who lost $100,000 in a 2021 SIM-swapping attack is suing the unknown holder of a cryptocurrency wallet that harbors his stolen funds. The case is thought to be the first in which a federal court has recognized the use of information included in a bitcoin transaction -- such as a...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
IBM Security Bulletins
IBM Security Bulletins
•added 2024/01/09 5:43 p.m.•51 views

Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in IBM Java Runtime affect z/Transaction Processing Facility

Summary There are multiple vulnerabilities in IBM® Runtime Environment Java™ Version 8 that is used by the z/TPF system. z/TPF has addressed the applicable CVEs. Vulnerability Details CVEID:CVE-2023-22049 DESCRIPTION: An unspecified vulnerability in Java SE related to the Libraries component coul...

5.9CVSS6.1AI score0.01469EPSS
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
•added 2024/01/08 3:15 a.m.•16 views

CVE-2023-47140

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 could allow a user to transfer or view files due to improper access controls...

8.1CVSS5.8AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
NVD
NVD
•added 2024/01/08 3:15 a.m.•31 views

CVE-2023-47140

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 could allow a user to transfer or view files due to improper access controls...

8.1CVSS5.8AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Prion
Prion
•added 2024/01/08 3:15 a.m.•28 views

Improper access control

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 could allow a user to transfer or view files due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 270259...

5.5CVSS6.6AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
•added 2024/01/08 2:08 a.m.•36 views

CVE-2023-47140 IBM CICS Transaction Gateway improper access controls

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 could allow a user to transfer or view files due to improper access controls...

4CVSS7.8AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
CVE
CVE
•added 2024/01/08 2:08 a.m.•70 views

CVE-2023-47140

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 (Containers) is affected by CVE-2023-47140 due to improper access controls that could allow a user to transfer or view files. The IBM Security Bulletin (CA480D0E529A...) states affected product: CICS Transaction Gateway Containers 9.3, with remediation guidance po...

8.1CVSS5.9AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References3Affected Software1
Vulnrichment
Vulnrichment
•added 2024/01/08 2:08 a.m.•21 views

CVE-2023-47140 IBM CICS Transaction Gateway improper access controls

IBM CICS Transaction Gateway 9.3 could allow a user to transfer or view files due to improper access controls...

4CVSS6.8AI score0.0022EPSS
SaveExploits0References1
Code423n4
Code423n4
•added 2024/01/08 12:00 a.m.•36 views

In FxERC20RootTunnel, there is no option to get bridged tokens back in case the transaction can not be executed on L2

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If the transaction on L2 fails to be executed the tokens deposited on L1 will be lost since there is no way to recover them Proof of Concept When calling FxERC20RootTunnel:: withdraw the users deposits a certain amount of tokens to the bridge that he wan...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder