HackerOne: Ability to escape database transaction through SQL injection, leading to arbitrary code execution

HackerOne has an internal backend interface that gives debugging capabilities to its engineers. One of the features is the ability to run EXPLAIN ANALYZE queries against a connected database. This feature is accessible by a handful of engineers. The feature is vulnerable to a SQL injection that...

PTP-03: Unsafe logic in repayLender() function

Lines of code Vulnerability details PTP-03: Unsafe logic in repayLender function Impact reduceDebt internal function is called before the actual transfer of tokens, meaning that it doesn't matter if the transaction fails or succeeds for any reason, debt will be reduced, causing a loss for the...

Add cancel and refund option for Transaction Recovery

Lines of code Vulnerability details Add cancel and refund option for Transaction Recovery Impact Transactions could fail or stuck, according to the documentation: Occasionally, transactions can get "stuck" in the pipeline from a source to destination chain e.g. due to one-off issues that arise wi...

Weak Transfer Logic

@solana/pay adopts a weak transfer logic. It doesn't properly check if a transaction is valid Solana Pay transfer, ending up validating multiple transfers...

CVE-2022-34163

IBM CICS TX 11.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 229333...

CVE-2022-34162

IBM CICS TX 11.1 could allow a remote attacker to hijack the clicking action of the victim. By persuading a victim to visit a malicious Web site, a remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to hijack the victim's click actions and possibly launch further attacks against the victim. IBM...

IBM CICS TX 操作系统命令注入漏洞

IBM CICS TX is a comprehensive, single transaction runtime package from IBM USA. An operating system command injection vulnerability exists in IBM CICS TX version 11.1 that originates from allowing an attacker with physical access to the system to execute code using a return and refresh attack...

IBM CICS TX 安全漏洞

IBM CICS TX Advanced is a comprehensive, single transaction runtime package from IBM USA. It can provide a cloud-native deployment model for standalone applications. An Access Control Error vulnerability exists in IBM CICS TX Advanced version 11.1, which stems from a failure to set a security...

Fedora: Security Advisory for golang-github-hashicorp-memdb (FEDORA-2022-ea8f4e232d)

The remote host is missing an update for the SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 2022 Greenbone AG Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only ifdescription...

CVE-2022-33955

IBM CICS TX 11.1 could allow allow an attacker with physical access to the system to execute code due using a back and refresh attack. IBM X-Force ID: 229312...

CVE-2022-34161

IBM CICS TX 11.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 229331...

CVE-2022-34163

IBM CICS TX 11.1 is vulnerable to HTTP header injection, caused by improper validation of input by the HOST headers. This could allow an attacker to conduct various attacks against the vulnerable system, including cross-site scripting, cache poisoning or session hijacking. IBM X-Force ID: 229333...

Call() should be used instead of transfer() on an address payable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The use of the deprecated transfer function for an address will inevitably make the transaction fail when : 1. The withdrawer smart contract does not implement a payable fallback function. 2. The withdrawer smart contract implements a payable fallback...

CALL() should be used instead of TRANSFER() on an address payable

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The use of the deprecated transfer function for an address will inevitably make the transaction fail when: 1 The claimer smart contract does not implement a payable function. 2 The claimer smart contract does implement a payable fallback which uses more...

Fedora: Security Advisory for golang-github-hashicorp-memdb (FEDORA-2022-3969b64d4b)

The remote host is missing an update for the Copyright C 2022 Greenbone Networks GmbH Some text descriptions might be excerpted from a referenced sources, and are Copyright C by the respective right holders. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later This program is free software; you can...

Auctioneer Cut calculated in different order of magnitude

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Auctioneer fee is calculated in different order of magnitude. Proof of Concept As your are defining auctioneerReward in 1e18 basis point being 1e18 100% you need to divide by 1e18 when calculating percentage. function setAuctioneerRewarduint128...

OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo account cannot process transactions on Goerli

Impact This vulnerability affects all accounts vanilla and ethereum flavors in the v0.2.0 release of OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo, which are not whitelisted on StarkNet mainnet, so only goerli deployments of v0.2.0 accounts are affected. This faulty behavior is not observed in StarkNet's...

CVE-2022-31153 OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo account cannot process transactions on Goerli

OpenZeppelin Contracts for Cairo is a library for contract development written in Cairo for StarkNet, a decentralized ZK Rollup. Version 0.2.0 is vulnerable to an error that renders account contracts unusable on live networks. This issue affects all accounts vanilla and ethereum flavors in the...

Upgraded Q -> H from 187 [1657760940788]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 187 as High risk. The relevant finding follows: 1. rescueETH cannot rescue Ether rescueETH sends msg.value to the destination address, which means it requires the caller of rescueETH to provide the Ether to send. Essentially the owner is directly paying the...

call() should be used instead of transfer() on address payable

Lines of code Vulnerability details call should be used instead of transfer on address payable Impact The use of the deprecated transfer function for an address wll make the transaction fail when 1. The withdrawer smart contract does not implement a payable function. 2. The withdrawer smart...