Lucene search
K

11 matches found

OSV
OSV
added 2026/01/26 9:30 p.m.2 views

GHSA-63V5-26VQ-M4VM Keycloak's missing timestamp validation allows attackers to extend SAML response validity periods

A flaw was found in Keycloak's SAML brokering functionality. When Keycloak is configured as a client in a Security Assertion Markup Language SAML setup, it fails to validate the NotOnOrAfter timestamp within the SubjectConfirmationData. This allows an attacker to delay the expiration of SAML...

3.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00023EPSS
Exploits0References7
EUVD
EUVD
added 2026/01/26 7:36 p.m.6 views

EUVD-2026-4670

A flaw was found in Keycloak's SAML brokering functionality. When Keycloak is configured as a client in a Security Assertion Markup Language SAML setup, it fails to validate the NotOnOrAfter timestamp within the SubjectConfirmationData. This allows an attacker to delay the expiration of SAML...

3.1CVSS5.8AI score0.00023EPSS
Exploits0References2
Github Security Blog
Github Security Blog
added 2020/04/22 8:59 p.m.49 views

Subject Confirmation Method not validated in Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET

Impact Saml2 tokens are usually used as bearer tokens - a caller that presents a token is assumed to be the subject of the token. There is also support in the Saml2 protocol for issuing tokens that is tied to a subject through other means, e.g. holder-of-key where possession of a private key must...

7.3CVSS1.8AI score0.00295EPSS
Exploits0References6Affected Software1
OSV
OSV
added 2020/04/21 5:15 p.m.10 views

CVE-2020-5268

In Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET versions before 1.0.2, and between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0, there is a vulnerability in how tokens are validated in some cases. Saml2 tokens are usually used as bearer tokens - a caller that presents a token is assumed to be the subject of the token. There is...

7.3CVSS7.1AI score
Exploits0References4
Prion
Prion
added 2020/04/21 5:15 p.m.15 views

Session fixation

In Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET versions before 1.0.2, and between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0, there is a vulnerability in how tokens are validated in some cases. Saml2 tokens are usually used as bearer tokens - a caller that presents a token is assumed to be the subject of the token. There is...

4.9CVSS7AI score0.00295EPSS
Exploits0References4Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2020/04/21 3:30 p.m.14 views

CVE-2020-5268 Subject Confirmation Method not validated in Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET

In Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET versions before 1.0.2, and between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0, there is a vulnerability in how tokens are validated in some cases. Saml2 tokens are usually used as bearer tokens - a caller that presents a token is assumed to be the subject of the token. There is...

6.5CVSS7AI score0.00295EPSS
Exploits0References4
CVE
CVE
added 2020/04/21 3:30 p.m.87 views

CVE-2020-5268

In Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET, versions before 1.0.2 and between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0 contain a vulnerability in token validation. Sustainsys.Saml2 incorrectly treats all incoming tokens as bearer tokens, despite tokens being subject-confirmed by other means (e.g., holder-of-key). An at...

7.3CVSS6.6AI score0.00295EPSS
Exploits0References4Affected Software1
RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
added 2015/04/16 4:2 p.m.4 views

CXF: Improper security semantics enforcement of SAML SubjectConfirmation methods

It was found that Apache WSS4J Web Services Security for Java, as used by Apache CXF with the TransportBinding, did not, by default, properly enforce all security requirements associated with SAML SubjectConfirmation methods. A remote attacker could use this flaw to perform various types of...

5CVSS5.8AI score0.0249EPSS
Exploits0References4
RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
added 2015/03/11 4:51 p.m.3 views

CXF: Improper security semantics enforcement of SAML SubjectConfirmation methods

It was found that Apache WSS4J Web Services Security for Java, as used by Apache CXF with the TransportBinding, did not, by default, properly enforce all security requirements associated with SAML SubjectConfirmation methods. A remote attacker could use this flaw to perform various types of...

5CVSS5.8AI score0.0249EPSS
Exploits0References4
RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
added 2014/12/18 5:58 p.m.4 views

CXF: Improper security semantics enforcement of SAML SubjectConfirmation methods

It was found that Apache WSS4J Web Services Security for Java, as used by Apache CXF with the TransportBinding, did not, by default, properly enforce all security requirements associated with SAML SubjectConfirmation methods. A remote attacker could use this flaw to perform various types of...

5CVSS5.8AI score0.0249EPSS
Exploits0References4
RedHat Linux
RedHat Linux
added 2014/12/18 5:48 p.m.0 views

CXF: Improper security semantics enforcement of SAML SubjectConfirmation methods

It was found that Apache WSS4J Web Services Security for Java, as used by Apache CXF with the TransportBinding, did not, by default, properly enforce all security requirements associated with SAML SubjectConfirmation methods. A remote attacker could use this flaw to perform various types of...

5CVSS5.8AI score0.0249EPSS
Exploits0References4
Rows per page
Query Builder