Design/Logic Flaw

meinheld prior to 1.0.2 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing...

HTTP Request Smuggling

Overview puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process...

CVE-2020-7658

CVE-2020-7658 affects the meinheld WSGI server, vulnerable before 1.0.2 to HTTP Request Smuggling due to incorrect parsing of Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers. This can enable HTTP pipelining issues and request-smuggling attacks as described in connected advisories. The documents do n...

CVE-2020-7658

meinheld prior to 1.0.2 is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks might be possible due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing...

HTTP Request Smuggling

Overview puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process...

CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

DEBIAN-CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

Code injection

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

CVE-2020-11077

CVE-2020-11077 affects the Puma RubyGem HTTP server. It describes an HTTP request/response smuggling scenario where a proxy with persistent connections and HTTP pipelining can cause the proxy to deliver a second response to the wrong client, due to how Puma parses the first request and its body. ...

CVE-2020-11077 HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

GHSA-W64W-QQPH-5GXM HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via...

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact This is a similar but different vulnerability to the one patched in 3.12.5 and 4.3.4. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via...

GHSA-X7JG-6PWG-FX5H HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response. Originally reported by @ZeddYu, who has our thanks for the detailed report. Patches The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4. For more information If you have any questions or comments...

HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

Impact By using an invalid transfer-encoding header, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response. Originally reported by @ZeddYu, who has our thanks for the detailed report. Patches The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4. For more information If you have any questions or comments...