3576 matches found
CVE-2018-13514
The CVE-2018-13514 entry concerns esportz, an Ethereum-based token. Connected sources confirm a vulnerability in the smart contract’s mintToken function caused by an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is described consistently acros...
CVE-2018-13509
CVE-2018-13509 concerns the IamRich Ethereum token. The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is described across multiple sources (CNVD-2018-13188, NVD/NVD data, etc.) as the root cause. The impact is arbit...
CVE-2018-13509
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IamRich, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13489
CVE-2018-13489 concerns the OllisCoin Ethereum token. The MintToken function in the smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that effectively lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The issue is described in multiple sources as a vulnerability in the toke...
CVE-2018-13496
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RajTestICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13497
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for COBToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13493
The CVE concerns a smart contract vulnerability in DaddyToken: the mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Affected software is a Ethereum token contract; the root cause is overflow in the mintToken implementation,...
CVE-2018-13531
CVE-2018-13531 concerns the mintToken function of MaxHouse, an Ethereum token, where an integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to set any user balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is rooted in arithmetic handling within the token minting logic, potentially enabling unauthori...
CVE-2018-13476
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PhilCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13569
The CVE-2018-13569 entry concerns HitToken, an Ethereum token whose smart contract mintToken has an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The affected component is the mintToken function within HitToken’s contract; root cause i...
CVE-2018-13712
The PMET project is affected by an integer overflow in the mintToken function of its Ethereum-based smart contract, enabling the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This describes a vulnerability in the mintToken implementation, with the underlying cause identified as ...
CVE-2018-13490
CVE-2018-13490 concerns the mintToken function of a FILM Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Impact stated: the owner can arbitrarily inflate balances, enabling manipulation of...
CVE-2018-13635
CVE-2018-13635 involves the mintToken function of a smart contract for the HBCM Ethereum token. A reported integer overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Public documents cite this behavior and its impact (potential integrity/import issues), with refer...
CVE-2018-13502
CVE-2018-13502 affects a HeliumNetwork smart contract (Ethereum token). The mintToken function has an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is documented in NVD as the root cause and impact (integrity manipulation, high impact per CV...
CVE-2018-13751
The CVE-2018-13751 entry concerns the JustWallet Ethereum token. A vulnerability in the mintToken function of its smart contract enables an overflow that allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Technical detail: an integer overflow in mintToken is the root cause...
CVE-2018-13574
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DataShieldCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13585
CHERRYCOIN is affected by CVE-2018-13585 due to an integer overflow in the mintToken function of its Ethereum smart contract. The overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value, constituting a direct integrity issue in the token implementation. The ava...
CVE-2018-13516
CVE-2018-13516 involves the mintToken function in the Super Cool Awesome Money (SCAM) Ethereum token, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Multiple connected documents (CNVD-2018-13191, CNVD-derived reports, PRION/CVE, NVD entry) de...
CVE-2018-13731
CVE-2018-13731 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for the Ethereum token TokenMACHU. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The description and linked sources indicate the impact is on balances cont...
CVE-2018-13760
CVE-2018-13760 concerns MoneyChainNet (MCN) as an Ethereum token with a vulnerable mintToken function in its smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. Documents confirm that this could enable ownershi...