3576 matches found
CVE-2018-13778
The CVE-2018-13778 entry concerns CGCToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The available documents describe the vulnerability as an integer overflow but do not provide concrete remediation steps, affected v...
CVE-2018-13672
CVE-2018-13672 affects the OBTCoin Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This could enable owner-level manipulation of token balances, potentially undermining token integrity and...
CVE-2018-13672
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for OBTCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13671
The CVE-2018-13671 entry concerns DinsteinCoin, an Ethereum token whose smart-contract mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, as described in the NVD entry and related references. The connected...
CVE-2018-13673
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GoldTokenERC20, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13667
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for UTBTokenTest, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13678
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Lottery, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13713
CVE-2018-13713 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Tradesman, an Ethereum token, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. The description and linked sources confirm the vulnerability class (integer...
CVE-2018-13714
CVE-2018-13714 concerns the mintToken function in a CM Ethereum token smart contract. Affected component: the CM token’s smart contract code. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary address. Impact: potential manipulation of toke...
CVE-2018-13719
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BiteduToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13716
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for sexhdsolo, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13716
The CVE-2018-13716 entry concerns a smart contract for sexhdsolo (Ethereum token) where the mintToken function suffers an integer overflow. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, indicating a flaw in balance accounting that can be manipulated ...
CVE-2018-13701
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KissMe, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13700
The CVE-2018-13700 issue affects IPMCoin—an Ethereum token—where the mintToken function of its smart contract contains an integer overflow. This vulnerability enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Documented in multiple sources (NVD/NVD entry for CVE-2018-137...
CVE-2018-13668
The CVE concerns the mintToken function of a BTPCoin Ethereum token smart contract, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Root cause: integer overflow in mintToken. Impact is described as enabling balance manipulation by the owner, wi...
CVE-2018-13680
The CVE-2018-13680 entry concerns the mintToken function of the LexitToken Ethereum smart contract, where an integer overflow vulnerability allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to an arbitrary value. The affected component is a smart contract implementation for Lexit...
CVE-2018-13677
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Goochain, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13710
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Mjolnir, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13718
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for FuturXe, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13718
CVE-2018-13718 concerns the FuturXe Ethereum token where the mintToken function has an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance. This is a developer-facing vulnerability in the smart contract implementation, with the root cause described as an integer overflow...