CVE-2018-13626

The CVE-2018-13626 entry concerns the mintToken function of SemainToken’s smart contract, where an integer overflow can let the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is rooted in arithmetic overflow within mintToken, impacting token balances and potentially enabli...

CVE-2018-13694

CVE-2018-13694 concerns the GMile Ethereum token smart contract. The issue is in the contract’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This constitutes a critical integrity risk for token balances and could comprom...

CVE-2018-13568

The CVE-2018-13568 entry concerns a smart contract (MktCoin) with a mintToken function that contains an integer overflow. The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to any value, revealing a control over user balances via this overflow. The provided sourc...

CVE-2018-13568

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MktCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13591

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KAPcoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13638

The CVE-2018-13638 issue affects Bitpark’s Ethereum token contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, exposing potential balance manipulation. The root cause is an overflow in balance assignment; impact i...

CVE-2018-13471

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BeyondCashToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13686

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ICO Dollar ICOD, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13533

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for ALUXToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13495

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for KMCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13543

The CVE-2018-13543 entry concerns GemstoneToken, an Ethereum token implemented as a smart contract. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This is the stated vulnerability and impact. The provided connec...

CVE-2018-13477

CVE-2018-13477 affects CTESale, an Ethereum token. The mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Connected sources reference the overflow in the mint logic and point to related project ...

CVE-2018-13624

WXSLToken is affected: the mintToken function in its Ethereum smart contract has an integer overflow, enabling the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The CVE entry and linked sources confirm the root cause and potential impact (balance manipulation). No explicit remed...

CVE-2018-13740

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for OneChain, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13602

The CVE-2018-13602 entry concerns a vulnerability in MiningToken’s smart contract. The mint function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. Concrete details provided identify the affected component as the mint function of Minin...

CVE-2018-13495

The CVE-2018-13495 entry concerns KMCToken’s mintToken function, where an integer overflow in the contract enables the owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The issue is located in the smart contract implementation for KMCToken (Ethereum token). Documented impact indicates potent...

CVE-2018-13781

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MyYLC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13709

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Tube, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13676

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Orderbook Presale Token OBP, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13478

The CVE-2018-13478 entry concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DMPToken (an Ethereum token) that contains an integer overflow. This overflow allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The attached connected documents corroborate thi...