CVE-2018-13637

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for CikkaCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13651

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MicoinNetworkToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13652

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TheGoDigital, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13651

The CVE-2018-13651 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of the MicoinNetworkToken smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, which enables the contract owner to set the balance of any arbitrary user to a chosen value. This is documented across multiple...

CVE-2018-13648

The CVE-2018-13648 entry concerns the mintToken function of a BGC Ethereum token smart contract. The root cause is an integer overflow in mintToken, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Documents confirm the component and vulnerability but do not provide ex...

CVE-2018-13583

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Shmoo, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13577

The CVE-2018-13577 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintToken function of a ShitCoin (SHITC) Ethereum token implementation (Contract Name: AdvancedShit). The connected sources confirm a integer overflow in mintToken that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, r...

CVE-2018-13610

The CVE-2018-13610 entry describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of MedicayunLink’s Ethereum token contract. The overflow permits the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s token balance, effectively enabling unauthorized balance manipulation. The vulnerability is rooted in ...

CVE-2018-13775

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RCKTCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13777

The CVE-2018-13777 entry concerns a flaw in the mintToken function of a RRToken Ethereum smart contract. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This is the concrete impact described across sources (NVD/NVD-derived record...

CVE-2018-13711

CVE-2018-13711 concerns a mintToken function in a Databits Ethereum token smart contract. The underlying issue is an integer overflow in the mintToken path that permits the contract owner to set an arbitrary user balance to any value. Documents across multiple sources (NVD/NVD-linked entries, CVE...

CVE-2018-13697

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RobotBTC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13708

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Order ETH Contract Name: BuyToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13679

The CVE-2018-13679 issue affects the ZPEcoin smart contract: the mintToken function incurs an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The vulnerability is described as a mint overflow in the Ethereum token implementation, with no explicit ...

CVE-2018-13712

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PMET, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13700

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for IPMCoin, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13696

The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RedTicket, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...

CVE-2018-13697

The CVE concerns RobotBTC, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow vulnerability. This flaw allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value, enabling potential arbitrary credit manipulation within the token system. Th...

CVE-2018-13698

The CVE-2018-13698 entry concerns a vulnerability in the mintTokens function of a smart contract implementing Play2LivePromo, an Ethereum token. The underlying issue is an integer overflow that enables the contract owner to set the balance of any user to an arbitrary value. This directly affects ...

CVE-2018-13698

The mintTokens function of a smart contract implementation for Play2LivePromo, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...