3877 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Information disclosure
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GOAL Bonanza GOAL, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Buffer overflow
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin SWFTC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...
Design/Logic Flaw
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Buffer overflow
The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...
Buffer overflow
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...
Design/Logic Flaw
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Code injection
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
Design/Logic Flaw
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...
CVE-2018-11446
The buy function of a smart contract implementation for Gold Reward GRX, an Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the buyer because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable buyPrice, aka the...
CVE-2018-12062
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SwftCoin SWFTC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...
CVE-2018-12068
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...
CVE-2018-12070
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for SEC, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka the...
CVE-2018-12078
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for PolyAI AI, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12079
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12081
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Target Coin TGT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12082
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for Fujinto NTO, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12084
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BitAsean BAS, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, has no period constraint, which allows the owner to increase the total supply of the digital assets arbitrarily so as to make profits, aka the "tradeTrap" issue...
CVE-2018-12063
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Internet Node Token INT, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable...
CVE-2018-12067
The sell function of a smart contract implementation for Substratum SUB, a tradable Ethereum ERC20 token, allows a potential trap that could be used to cause financial damage to the seller, because of overflow of the multiplication of its argument amount and a manipulable variable sellPrice, aka...