294 matches found
CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
DEBIAN-CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
Information disclosure
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
PYSEC-2020-94
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
UBUNTU-CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
PYSEC-2020-94
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
CVE-2020-5390
PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping XSW. The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature...
PT-2020-5164
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions PySAML2 versions prior to 5.0.0 Description The issue is related to incorrect verification of cryptographic signatures in SAML2 documents, allowing a remote attacker to bypass signature checks and access protected information. This is due to t...
Authentication Bypass
Overview Versions of samlify prior to 2.4.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass. The package fails to prevent XML Signature Wrapping, allowing tokens to be reused with different usernames. A remote attacker can modify SAML content for a SAML service provider without invalidating the...
Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in WSS4J affects IBM Cúram (CVE-2015-0226 & CVE-2015-0227 )
Summary IBM Cúram is shipped with a third party library called WSS4J, which is vulnerable to an attack on XML Encryption. WSS4J also fails to properly enforce the requireSignedEncryptedDataElements property which leaves it vulnerable to XML Signature wrapping attacks . Vulnerability Details CVEID...
Node.js third-party modules: Samlify is vulnerable to signature wrapping
I would like to report a signature wrapping weakness in samlify It allows an attacker to modify a SAML token received from the IdP before validating it with the service provider Module module name: samlify version: 2.3.7 npm page: https://www.npmjs.com/package/samlify Module Description Highly...
Samlify vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by allowing tokens to be reused with different usernames
Versions of samlify prior to 2.4.0-rc5 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass. The package fails to prevent XML Signature Wrapping, allowing tokens to be reused with different usernames. A remote attacker can modify SAML content for a SAML service provider without invalidating the cryptographic...
GHSA-8JJF-W7J6-323C Samlify vulnerable to Authentication Bypass by allowing tokens to be reused with different usernames
Versions of samlify prior to 2.4.0-rc5 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass. The package fails to prevent XML Signature Wrapping, allowing tokens to be reused with different usernames. A remote attacker can modify SAML content for a SAML service provider without invalidating the cryptographic...
XML Signature Wrapping
Samlify and express-saml2 are vulnerable to XML signature wrapping attacks. Attackers who observe SAML responses are able to add NameID's to the response without breaking the signature check. This could allow them to login as any user...
CVE-2017-1000452
An XML Signature Wrapping vulnerability exists in Samlify 2.2.0 and earlier, and in predecessor Express-saml2 which could allow attackers to impersonate arbitrary users...