CVE-2022-30238

A CWE-287: Improper Authentication vulnerability exists that could allow an attacker to take over the admin account when an attacker hijacks a session. Affected Products: Wiser Smart, EER21000 & EER21001 V4.5 and prior...

CVE-2022-30233

A CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could allow the product to be maliciously manipulated when the user is tricked into performing certain actions on a webpage. Affected Products: Wiser Smart, EER21000 & EER21001 V4.5 and prior...

CVE-2022-30237

A CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data vulnerability exists that could allow authentication credentials to be recovered when an attacker breaks the encoding. Affected Products: Wiser Smart, EER21000 & EER21001 V4.5 and prior...

CVE-2022-30234

A CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability exists that could allow arbitrary code to be executed when root level access is obtained. Affected Products: Wiser Smart, EER21000 & EER21001 V4.5 and prior...

多款ESET产品安全漏洞

ESET Smart Security Premium and others are products of ESET Slovakia.Smart Security Premium is a suite of antivirus programs.Internet Security is a suite of antivirus programs for Internet security.Eset Endpoint Antivirus and others are products of Eset Slovakia.Eset Endpoint Antivirus is an...

CVE-2021-37851

Local privilege escalation in Windows products of ESET allows user who is logged into the system to exploit repair feature of the installer to run malicious code with higher privileges. This issue affects: ESET, spol. s r.o. ESET NOD32 Antivirus 11.2 versions prior to 15.1.12.0. ESET, spol. s r.o...

NewStart CGSL MAIN 6.02 : opensc Multiple Vulnerabilities (NS-SA-2022-0062)

The remote NewStart CGSL host, running version MAIN 6.02, has opensc packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities: - The Oberthur smart card software driver in OpenSC before 0.21.0-rc1 has a heap-based buffer overflow in scoberthurreadfile. CVE-2020-26570 - The gemsafe GPK sma...

ERC20 transfers does not work on non-standard compliant tokens like USDT

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory.sol Consider this function: function deposituint poolId, uint amount external Pool storage pool = poolspoolId; requirepool.id == poolId, 'Uninitialized pool'; requireblock.timestamp pool.startTime, 'Cannot deposit before po...

Transfers Will Revert On Non-Standard ERC20 Token Contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There are several contracts which do not utilise OpenZeppelin's SafeERC20 library when performing token transfers. The FactoryDAO suite of smart contracts intends to support transfers by all tokens, including non-standard tokens such as USDT which does n...

if user send uninitialized poolId to function deposit() of PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory, then attacker can cause user fund to be locked forever, and only unlock it if user pays ransom

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function deposit of PermissionlessBasicPoolFactory supposed to revert if user send uninitialized poolId by mistake, but if user does this, attacker can perform front-running attack and create multiple pools with his smart contract and be owner of that...

steal user funds with front-running when he calls depositTokens() of MerkleVesting and MerkleResistor with wrong treeIndex (uninitiated)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This nature of this bug is similar in MerkleVesting and MerkleResistor and MerkleDropFactory, so I only write MerkleDropFactory version: If a user calls depositTokens with wrong treeIndex value by mistake, attacker can perform front-running attack and...

call() should be used instead of transfer() on an address payable

Lines of code Vulnerability details This is a classic Code4rena issue: instead of call , transfer is used to withdraw the ether 2021-04-meebits-findings2 Swap.sol implements potentially dangerous transfer 2021-10-tally-findings20 OpenLevV1Lib's and LPool's doTransferOut functions call native...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (7)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (3)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (8)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (1)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (5)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

amount requires to be updated to contract balance increase (14)

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Every time transferFrom or transfer function in ERC20 standard is called there is a possibility that underlying smart contract did not transfer the exact amount entered. It is required to find out contract balance increase/decrease after the transfer. Th...

VaultCore's withdrawETH uses transfer function, which can be unusable for some smart contracts

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When a user wishes to withdraw their collateral from a WETH vault, the funds are returned to the user with msg.sender.transfer. Using transfer is not recommended anymore, especially for critical operations like withdrawing collateral from a vault as it...

Users Who approve() ERC20 Tokens for NFTPair of NFTPairWithOracle Contracts May Have Their Allowances Stole By Any User

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User's who approve ERC20 or any other token type excluding the collateral token may have their balances stolen by any user. The ACTIONCALL allows users to call any function on any smart contract excluding this, collateral and bentoBox. Thus, if any user...