Lucene search
+L

13895 matches found

Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2023/01/24 12:00 a.m.26 views

CVE-2022-47100

A vulnerability in Sengled Smart bulb 0x0000024 allows attackers to arbitrarily perform a factory reset on the device via a crafted IEEE 802.15.4 frame...

7.5AI score0.01EPSS
SaveExploits1References1
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/23 12:00 a.m.5 views

Managing Incomplete Transactions in the _assertConsiderationLengthIsNotLessThanOriginalConsiderationLength Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In the assertConsiderationLengthIsNotLessThanOriginalConsiderationLength function, the revertMissingOriginalConsiderationItems function is called if the supplied consideration item total is less than the original consideration item total. However, there ...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/23 12:00 a.m.9 views

The _verifyTime function only reverts if revertOnInvalid is true and the order is not active.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The verifyTime function only reverts if revertOnInvalid is true and the order is not active. This means that if revertOnInvalid is not passed or is false, the function will not revert even if the order is not active. It could have a significant impact on...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/23 12:00 a.m.9 views

The _verifySignature function skips signature verification if the offerer is the caller.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact it could have a significant impact on the security of the smart contract. The function is intended to verify the signature of an order, but if the offerer is the caller, the function skips the signature verification. This could allow someone other than t...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/22 12:00 a.m.13 views

Exploring the Vulnerabilities of Seaport: A Technical Analysis of a Fake Signature Attack on Non-Fungible Tokens

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact This finding aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the sc4m trend, which emerged in August 2022, and has since been a prevalent issue in the WEB3 space. Despite efforts to combat this phenomenon, bad actors continue to engage in illicit activities,...

7.2AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/22 12:00 a.m.20 views

Upgraded Q -> M from #658 [1674423108320]

Judge has assessed an item in Issue 658 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: L-05 MARGIN ASSET TOKENS WITH MORE THAN 18 DECIMALS ARE NOT SUPPORTED As shown below, arithmetic operations of the StableVault.deposit, StableVault.withdraw, Trading.handleDeposit, and Trading.handleWithdraw function...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/21 12:00 a.m.10 views

Unhandled Revert in _performERC721Transfer Function Resulting in Loss of Tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact transferFrom function is used to transfer ownership of ERC721 tokens from one address to another. If this function reverts, it means that the transfer failed, and the ownership of the tokens should not be changed. However, the code in the...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/21 12:00 a.m.12 views

Out-of-Memory Exception in _performERC1155BatchTransfers Function Leading to Loss of Tokens.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the safeBatchTransferFrom function reverts, the code copies the revert data to memory in order to revert the transaction. However, the code does not properly handle memory allocation for this data, which could lead to an out-of-memory exception. If ...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/21 12:00 a.m.9 views

Potential Manipulation Vulnerability in _validateOrdersAndPrepareToFulfill Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The smart contract may not be properly validated, which could lead to fraudulent or malicious orders being fulfilled. This could result in loss of assets or other financial damage to users of the contract. Additionally, if the validation process is not...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/21 12:00 a.m.28 views

ConduitController: Smart Contract Initial Owner Vulnerability

Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description The createConduit function in the ConduitController smart contract is responsible for deploying new conduits, or contracts that allow registered callers or open "channels" to transfer approved ERC20/721/1155 tokens on their behalf. The function...

6.9AI score
SaveExploits0
WPVulnDB
WPVulnDB
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.20 views

WP Smart Preloader < 1.15.1 - Admin+ Stored XSS

The plugin does not sanitise and escape some of its settings, which could allow high privilege users such as admin to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks even when the unfilteredhtml capability is disallowed for example in multisite setup...

5.9CVSS4.8AI score0.00392EPSS
SaveExploits0Affected Software1
Cvelist
Cvelist
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.30 views

CVE-2020-22653

In Ruckus R310 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus R500 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus R600 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T300 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T301n 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T301s 10.5.1.0.199, SmartCell Gateway 200 SCG200 before 3.6.2.0.795, SmartZone 100 SZ-100 before 3.6.2.0.795, SmartZone 300 SZ300 before 3.6.2.0.795, Virtua...

9.5AI score0.00514EPSS
SaveExploits0References2
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.11 views

Missing require statement for sellAmount in init() function leading to potential loss of funds.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact init function is missing a require statement to check if the input variable sellAmount is less than or equal to the contract's balance of sell tokens. This means that the contract is allowing the user to initiate an auction with a sell amount greater tha...

6.6AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.16 views

Possible Unauthorized Redemption of Collateral ERC20 Tokens due to Lack of Proper Check in redeem() Function

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact An attacker who is not authorized by the smart contract could potentially redeem more tokens than they are entitled to. This could cause a loss of funds for the smart contract and its users, as well as potentially destabilizing the overall ecosystem...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.9 views

Lack of proper input validation in fulfillBasicOrder function.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact function fulfillBasicOrder BasicOrderParameters calldata parameters external payable returns bool fulfilled; fulfillBasicOrder function is designed to fulfill basic orders on the marketplace, however, the code provided does not clearly define what fields...

7AI score
SaveExploits0
Patchstack
Patchstack
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.16 views

WordPress WP Smart Preloader Plugin <= 1.15 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Software WP Smart Preloader Type Plugin Vulnerable versions = 1.15 Fixed in 1.15.1 OWASP Top 10 A7: Cross-Site Scripting XSS Classification Cross Site Scripting XSS CVE CVE-2023-23675 Patch priority Low CVSS severity Low 5.9 Developer Claim ownership PSID 25728fd02383 Credits Rio Darmawan Require...

5.9CVSS6AI score0.00392EPSS
SaveExploits0References2Affected Software1
BDU FSTEC
BDU FSTEC
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.11 views

The vulnerability of the Smart Card Resource Management Server, a server for managing smart card resources on the Microsoft Windows operating system, arises due to security configuration errors. This vulnerability allows attackers to circumvent security restrictions.

The vulnerability of the Smart Card Resource Management Server, a server for managing smart card resources in the Microsoft Windows operating system, is related to security configuration errors. Exploiting this vulnerability can allow attackers to circumvent security restrictions and enhance thei...

3.3CVSS6.3AI score0.00591EPSS
SaveExploits0References3
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.10 views

Wrong check isContract for Permit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact In function: requireSignature. The validation to check whether the msg.sender is a smart contract is not enough in this case. Anyone could bypass that check by calling that function from the constructor of a newly deployed contract. Therefore not the rig...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/20 12:00 a.m.12 views

High Severity Reentrancy Vulnerability in stateTransition Modifier

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Lack of reentrancy protection in the stateTransition modifier occurs in the following line of code. modifier stateTransitionTradeStatus begin, TradeStatus end requirestatus == begin, "Invalid trade state"; status = TradeStatus.PENDING; ; assertstatus ==...

6.8AI score
SaveExploits0
Code423n4
Code423n4
added 2023/01/19 12:00 a.m.20 views

User can lose 10 ethers to Vault

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact If a user or a contract that has a large allowance 10 ethers or max on an ERC4626Cloned based Vault that has not yet received any deposits, calls mint with 0 share argument, will have a 10 ethers of the asset transferred to the Vault with no way to recla...

6.7AI score
SaveExploits0
Rows per page
Query Builder