CVE-2023-49577

The SAP HCM SMART PAYE solution - versions S4HCMCIE 100, SAPHRCIE 600, SAPHRCIE 604, SAPHRCIE 608, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on confidentiality and...

CVE-2023-49577

The SAP HCM SMART PAYE solution - versions S4HCMCIE 100, SAPHRCIE 600, SAPHRCIE 604, SAPHRCIE 608, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on confidentiality and...

Cross site scripting

The SAP HCM SMART PAYE solution - versions S4HCMCIE 100, SAPHRCIE 600, SAPHRCIE 604, SAPHRCIE 608, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on confidentiality and...

CVE-2023-49577

CVE-2023-49577 affects SAP HCM (SMART PAYE solution) versions S4HCMCIE 100, SAP_HRCIE 600, 604, 608. Root cause is insufficient encoding of user-controlled inputs, enabling cross-site scripting (XSS). Impact is limited to confidentiality and integrity of the application; no availability impact. E...

CVE-2023-49577 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the SAP HCM (SMART PAYE solution)

The SAP HCM SMART PAYE solution - versions S4HCMCIE 100, SAPHRCIE 600, SAPHRCIE 604, SAPHRCIE 608, does not sufficiently encode user-controlled inputs, resulting in Cross-Site Scripting XSS vulnerability. After successful exploitation, an attacker can cause limited impact on confidentiality and...

Fee-on-transfer/rebasing tokens will have problems when swapping

Lines of code 110 Vulnerability details Uniswap v3 does not support rebasing or fee-on-transfer tokens so using these tokens with it will result funds getting stuck. With fee-on-transfer tokens, if the balance isn't checked, the wrong amount may be transferred out. With rebasing tokens, the...

Use of transferFrom() rather than safeTransferFrom() for NFTs in will lead to the loss of NFTs

Lines of code 230, 342, 514, 536 Vulnerability details The EIP-721 standard says the following about transferFrom: /// @notice Transfer ownership of an NFT -- THE CALLER IS RESPONSIBLE /// TO CONFIRM THAT to IS CAPABLE OF RECEIVING NFTS OR ELSE /// THEY MAY BE PERMANENTLY LOST /// @dev Throws...

PT-2023-8279 · Ivanti · Ivanti Avalanche

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Ivanti Avalanche affected versions not specified Description: The issue is related to an XML External Entity XXE vulnerability in the Smart Device Server, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to leak data or perform a Server-Side...

Vulnerability of the file /ipms/imageConvert/image. Smart technologies for parking management by Dahua Smart Parking Management allow a violator to carry out an SSRF attack.

The vulnerability of the /ipms/imageConvert/image component in Dahua Smart Parking Management’s smart technology for parking management is related to insufficient validation of incoming requests. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow a malicious actor to execute an SSRF attack remotely...

smart-cities.eu Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3810091

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

smart-element.net Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3809841

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

Atlassian Jira Service Management Data Center and Server 4.20.x < 4.20.27 / 5.4.x < 5.4.11 (JSDSERVER-14748)

The version of Atlassian Jira Service Management Data Center and Server Jira Service Desk running on the remote host is affected by a vulnerability as referenced in the JSDSERVER-14748 advisory. - A vulnerability was discovered in the indexOf function of JSONParserByteArray in JSON Smart versions...

Smart Forms < 2.6.85 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary Options Update

Description The plugin does not have authorisation in an AJAX action hooked to smartformssavesettings, and does not ensure that the option to be updated belong to the plugin. As a result, any authenticated users, such as subscriber could update arbitrary options such as defaultrole and...

Design/Logic Flaw

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/email protected and @openzeppelin/email protected, all subcalls are executed twice...

CVE-2023-49798

OpenZeppelin Contracts’ CVE-2023-49798 relates to a merge-conflict error in the Multicall.sol implementation that caused all subcalls to be executed twice in versions @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected]. This duplication could lead to unintended duplicate o...

CVE-2023-49798 Duplicated execution of subcalls in OpenZeppelin Contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

CVE-2023-49798 Duplicated execution of subcalls in OpenZeppelin Contracts

OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. A merge issue when porting the 5.0.1 patch to the 4.9 branch caused a line duplication. In the version of Multicall.sol released in @openzeppelin/[email protected] and @openzeppelin/[email protected], all subcalls are...

Unwrap Fee Rounding Down: Revenue Loss, User Unfairness, and Reduced Confidence

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The issue with the unwrap fee rounding down can have several detrimental impacts on the Ocean protocol: 1. Revenue Loss: Due to rounding down, the contract loses out on potential unwrap fees, particularly for smaller unwrap amounts. This can significantl...

Multiple re-entrancy issues allowing stealing of funds and bypassing protocol mint limits

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Multiple re-entrancy issues exist in the codebase, that break core functionality and allow stealing of user funds. In AuctionDemo.sol contract re-entrancy in cancelBid and cancelAllBids allows stealing of user funds. There are multiple attack surfaces,...

Unrestricted Unwrap Fee Changes: Instability, Market Disruption, and Loss of Trust

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current changeUnwrapFee function in the Ocean smart contract allows the owner to change the unwrap fee divisor with no restrictions, leading to several negative impacts: 1. Unstable Unwrap Fees: Frequent changes in the divisor can cause instability a...