91 matches found
CVE-2024-56169
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...
UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56169
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...
UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56170
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...
CVE-2024-56169
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...
CVE-2024-56169
Fort Validator (Fort) versions up to 1.6.4 are affected by a validation integrity issue where the backup cache is only used to save bandwidth, and there is no viable fallback if a fetch fails or yields incorrect files. This leads to incomplete route-origin validation data. Upgrading to 2.0.0 or l...
CVE-2024-56170
Fort Validator (Fort) versions up to 1.6.4 prior to 2.0.0 contain a validation integrity issue in RPKI manifest handling. The root cause is that the system does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached one, allowing a rollback to a valid outdated man...
CVE-2024-56169
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...
CVE-2024-56169
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...
CVE-2024-56170
A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...
NULL Pointer Dereference
Fort is vulnerable to NULL Pointer Dereference. The vulnerability is caused due to a malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field which Fort dereferences without sanitizing it first. Because...
NULL Pointer Dereference
Fort is vulnerable to NULL Pointer Dereference. The vulnerability is caused due to a malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a resource certificate containing an Authority Key Identifier extension that lacks the keyIdentifier field which For...
Denial Of Service (DOS)
Fort is vulnerable to Denial Of Service DOS. The vulnerability is caused due to a malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form which bypasses Fort's BER decoder. This...
CVE-2024-45238
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a resource certificate containing a bit string that doesn't properly decode into a Subject Public Key. OpenSSL does not report this problem during parsin...
CVE-2024-45234
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics...
CVE-2024-45235
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a resource certificate containing an Authority Key Identifier extension that lacks the keyIdentifier field. Fort references this pointer without sanitizi...
CVE-2024-45239
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, ...
CVE-2024-45239
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a null eContent field. Fort dereferences the pointer without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, ...
CVE-2024-45236
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a signed object containing an empty signedAttributes field. Fort accesses the set's elements without sanitizing it first. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying...
CVE-2024-45234
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics...
DEBIAN-CVE-2024-45234
An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics...