865 matches found
CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract: GasLimitTooHigh revert error not caught
Lines of code Vulnerability details Summary The relayCalls function in the CrossChainRelayerArbitrum contract reverts when the gasLimit parameter is greater than the maxGasLimit, but it does not have a catch block to handle the error. As a result, the transaction will fail without providing any...
Code is vulnerable to ERC4626 first depositor shares manipulation exploit
Lines of code Vulnerability details Proof of Concept The normal ERC4626 implementation which is not changed in the repository has a vulnerability which can result in the first depositor stealing every subsequent depositor’s funds. It works like this: 1. Vault is just deployed and Bob deposits jus...
Unbreakable Enterprise kernel security update
5.15.0-4.70.5.2 - Revert 'sched: Remove the limitation of WFONCPU on wakelist if wakee cpu is idle' Samasth Norway Ananda Orabug: 34783367 5.15.0-4.70.5.1 - NFSv4: Fixes for nfs4inodereturndelegation Trond Myklebust Orabug: 34751176 5.15.0-4.70.5 - uek: kabi: update kABI files for new symbols Sae...
Upgraded Q -> M from #307 [1669043813221]
Judge has assessed an item in Issue 307 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: L-1. Wrong comparison sign Description The function swapAVAXForExactTokens will revert when msg.value amountsIn0 because amountsIn0 - msg.value will always cause underflow. Solidity version ^0.8.0 is used, so it will...
GiantMevAndFeesPool::afterTokenTransfer doesn't update claimed amount of sender
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact After a token transfer of GiantMevAndFeesPool's GiantLP, the receiver gets their claimed amount updated to the correct value, but the sender does not. If more than zero tokens were transferred, that amount in the sender's future rewards will be lost, and...
Unbreakable Enterprise kernel-container security update
5.4.17-2136.313.6 - Uninitialized variable imageext in fixupvdsoexception of extable.c Alok Tiwari Orabug: 33000550 - NFSD: fix use-after-free on source server when doing inter-server copy Dai Ngo Orabug: 34475857 - EDAC/mceamd: Do not load edacmceamd module on guests Smita Koralahalli Orabug:...
Tx should revert when the call in _returnDust failed
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User may lose remaining ETH of the transaction Proof of Concept As the returned status of the call in returnDust is ignored, the tx will success even if the call failed, which means the caller does not get his ETH back. Tools Used n/a Recommended...
_returnETHIfAny() can silently fail, leading to an originator not getting the expected refund
Lines of code Vulnerability details The execute function refunds the unused ETH back to the originator through returnETHIfAny. This internal function uses a low-level call to transfer the ETH. The issue is that the return value of the call is not checked. As per the Solidity documentation...
It is possible for a user's ETH to be trapped inside the contracts.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact It is possible that a user's ETH will be trapped inside the contracts. returnETHIfAnyoriginator; But in the implementation of the returnETHIfAny function, it will just silently return even the returning ETH transaction fails. As a result, even if the use...
Unsafe usage of ERC20 transfer and transferFrom
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Some ERC20 tokens functions don’t return a boolean, for example, USDT, BNB, OMG. So the LowLevelERC20Transfer contract simply won’t work with tokens like that as the token. Proof of Concept USDT’s transfer and transferFrom functions don't return a bool,...
Potential DoS when closing a credit nominated in ETH in the LineOfCredit contract
Lines of code Vulnerability details When closing a credit that was issued in ETH, the LineOfCredit contract will send the lender his deposit and any accrued interests using the address.transferamount function, which may fail and revert the whole function, leading to an eventual DoS. Impact The...
CLSA-2022-1667512639 Fix CVE(s): CVE-2016-3709
SECURITY UPDATE: Possible cross-site scripting vulnerability in libxml2 - debian/patches/CVE-2016-3709.patch: Revert commit 960f0e27 that has some problems - CVE-2016-3709 Fix parser termination from "Double hyphen within comment" error...
CVE-2022-3675
Fedora CoreOS supports setting a GRUB bootloader password using a Butane config. When this feature is enabled, GRUB requires a password to access the GRUB command-line, modify kernel command-line arguments, or boot non-default OSTree deployments. Recent Fedora CoreOS releases have a...
_payoutEth() gas computation can make call revert even if balance is sufficient
Lines of code Vulnerability details Payout recipients can call getEthPayout to transfer the ETH balance of the contract to all payout recipients. This function makes an internal call to payoutEth, which computes the gasCost, then proceeds to check balance - gasCost 10000 before sending the result...
_payoutToken() breaks if tokenAddress is USDT - for Ethereum contracts.
Lines of code Vulnerability details If USDT is used for a sale at some point - either through a direct sale on the NFT collection, or sent to the collection from a marketplace sale - it will remain in the contract, as getTokenPayoutaddressUSDT calls systematically revert: on Ethereum, USDT.transf...
_payoutToken[s]() is not compatible with tokens with missing return value
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Payout is blocked and tokens are stuck in contract. Proof of Concept PA1D.payoutToken and PA1D.payoutTokens call ERC20.transfer in a require-statement to send tokens to a list of payout recipients. Some tokens do not return a bool e.g. USDT, BNB, OMG on...
TokenHelper.sol#L40 : safeTransfer will revert due to insufficient gas.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact I am adding as high issue since most of the calling is done using the safeTransfer TokenHelper.solL40 : safeTransfer will revert due to insufficient gas. All the fuctions that are using the safeTransfer could fail due to insufficient gas. I see the...
Logical error in function getSwapOut
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. There is a logical error between lines 178-184 for function getSwapOut in contract LBRouter if amountIn != 0 activeId = LBPair.findFirstNonEmptyBinIduint24activeId, swapForY; else break; // end while if...
Upgraded Q -> M from 400 [1666366548697]
Judge has assessed an item in Issue 400 as Medium risk. The relevant finding follows: Use address.call instead of payable.transfer Avoid use of transfer to send ether since transfer sends a fixed amount of gas and future gas cost change may cause revert, The receiving contract will also revert if...
Initialize: No access control for initializatino and possible multiple initializations
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. First of all, there is no modifier for access control, any one can call initialize and the two require statements won't provent it. Second, it is possible that the initialize function is called multiple...