246 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2388. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-2388. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2388 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-5196. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-5196. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-5196 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-2650. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-2650. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-2650 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-1690. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-1690. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-1690 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2013-6488
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-0328. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-0328. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-0328 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-0328. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-0328. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-0328 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-4404. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-4404. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-4404 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-0237. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-0237. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-0237 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1636. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-1636. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1636 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2012-5661
CVE-2012-5661 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2012-5598
CVE-2012-5598 is rejected/duplicate of CVE-2012-6060; do not use this CVE entry.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3522. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3522. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3522 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2008-4317
CVE-2008-4317 is a reservation/duplicate of CVE-2008-5019 and does not represent a separate active vulnerability entry. Connected documents (Nessus advisories) discuss multiple Mozilla Firefox/SeaMonkey/NSS-related flaws (CVE-2008-0017, CVE-2008-5012/5013/5014/5015/5016/5017/5018/5019, CVE-2008-5...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5339. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-5339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4568. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4568. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4568 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2007-4989
CVE-2007-4989 is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4568 (the active entry). The connected Nessus/NASL documents describe CVE-2007-4568 as an integer overflow in the X.Org X Font Server (xfs) before 1.0.5 that enables a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via crafted QueryXBitmaps/QueryXEx...
CVE-2007-4019
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2930. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2930. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2930 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2931. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-2931. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2931 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...