14097 matches found
CVE-2022-30294
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-30293. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2022-30293. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-30293 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent...
CVE-2022-1214
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority for the following reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...
CVE-2022-1588
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...
CVE-2022-1588
Contao 4.13.2 is associated with a Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability accessible via the canonical URL handling. The issue arises from insufficient validation of user input in the page canonical URL path, allowing injection of malicious JavaScript (e.g., using a URL like /contao/"> ). Pu...
CVE-2022-28066
CVE-2022-28066 is listed as a duplicate of CVE-2022-26280 and is not the active entry. Connected documents provide concrete details for the underlying issue in libarchive: an out-of-bounds read via the zipx_lzma_alone_init in libarchive versions older than 3.6.1-1. This affects libarchive (3.6.0 ...
CVE-2022-1214
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...
CVE-2022-1214
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...
UBUNTU-CVE-2022-1214
REJECT DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This CVE has been rejected as it was incorrectly assigned. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage...
CVE-2022-24874
This CVE entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
CVE-2022-1246
CVE-2022-1246 is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability entry.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2022-27902
This CVE-2022-27902 entry is rejected/not used; reference CVE-2022-1215 instead.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-27666. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2022-27666. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-27666 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed t...
CVE-2021-44907
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority for the following reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
CVE-2021-44907
CVE-2021-44907 affects IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises. The vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to insufficient sanitization of a property in gs.parse. The IBM bulletin provides the vulnerability details but does not specify a remedia...
CVE-2021-32505
CVE-2021-32505 is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2021-32502
CVE-2021-32502 entry is rejected/not used per the Initial Description.
CVE-2021-32501
CVE-2021-32501 entry rejected/not used per the initial description.
CVE-2021-3558
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority for the following reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...