772 matches found
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-8558
CVE-2016-8558 entry is rejected/not used and does not represent an active vulnerability.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none...
CVE-2016-2265
CVE-2016-2265 entry is rejected and not used per the Initial Description.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0974. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2014-0974. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0974 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
CVE-2016-4347
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-7558. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-7558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-7558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-0284. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2015-0284. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-0284 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2013. Notes: none...
CVE-2013-6153
CVE-2013-6153 is rejected/not used; this entry does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2013-6150
The CVE-2013-6150 entry is rejected/not used; it does not represent an active vulnerability.
CVE-2015-2235
CVE-2015-2235 is rejected and not used; this entry does not represent an active vulnerability.
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-7169. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-7169. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-7169 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-0603. Reason: This issue was MERGED into CVE-2014-0603 in accordance with CVE content decisions, because it is the same type of vulnerability and affects the same versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-0603...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none...
Design/Logic Flaw
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: This ID is frequently used as an example of the 2014 CVE-ID syntax change, which allows more than 4 digits in the sequence number. Notes: See references...