CVE-2018-11070

Affected software: RSA BSAFE Crypto-J and RSA BSAFE SSL-J. Vulnerable components are the PKCS #1 unpadding path that enables a covert timing channel (Bleichenbacher-style) attack. Versions prior to 6.2.4 for both Crypto-J and SSL-J are impacted. Impact: a remote attacker could potentially recover...

CVE-2018-11070

RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.4 and RSA BSAFE SSL-J versions prior to 6.2.4 contain a Covert Timing Channel vulnerability during PKCS 1 unpadding operations, also known as a Bleichenbacher attack. A remote attacker may be able to recover a RSA key...

Google Chrome Security Bypass Vulnerability (CNVD-2018-22396)

Google Chrome is a web browser developed by the American company Google Google. A security vulnerability exists in Google Chrome versions prior to 69.0.3497.81. A remote attacker can exploit the vulnerability to bypass site quarantine restrictions after tab recovery...

CVE-2018-9194

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under VIP SSL feature when CPx being used...

CVE-2018-9194

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under VIP SSL feature when CPx being used...

CVE-2018-9192

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under SSL Deep Inspection feature when CPx bein...

CVE-2018-9194

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under VIP SSL feature when CPx being used...

CVE-2018-9192

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under SSL Deep Inspection feature when CPx bein...

CVE-2018-9192

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under SSL Deep Inspection feature when CPx bein...

CVE-2018-9194

CVE-2018-9194 relates to a plaintext recovery/MiTM vulnerability in RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 encryption exposed under Fortinet FortiOS VIP SSL when CPx is used, affecting FortiOS 5.4.6–5.4.9 and 6.0.0–6.0.1. The issue arises without knowledge of the server’s private key. Connected sources identify the vul...

CVE-2018-9192

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under SSL Deep Inspection feature when CPx bein...

CVE-2018-9194

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key. Fortinet FortiOS 5.4.6 to 5.4.9, 6.0.0 and 6.0.1 are vulnerable by such attack under VIP SSL feature when CPx being used...

CVE-2018-9192

The CVE-2018-9192 entry corresponds to the ROBOT attack against RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 in Fortinet FortiOS when SSL Deep Inspection CPx is used. Connected documents confirm a Bleichenbacher-style plaintext-recovery/MiTM vulnerability affecting FortiOS versions 5.4.6–5.4.9 and 6.0.0–6.0.1. The root cause...

3 Cybersecurity Takeaways from Ocean’s 8 (Note: Spoiler Alert!)

I love watching movies. A few days ago, I watched the movie "Ocean's 8" with my wife, and I found this movie was a perfect education material for the cyber security experts. Here are my 3 takeaways from the movie: 1 You think you are protected? Think again… Remember in the movie, the hacker "9-ba...

Dell EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite Hidden Timed Channel Vulnerability

Dell EMC RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite MES is an encryption toolkit from Dell USA. The toolkit can help developers achieve stable and secure application design. A security vulnerability exists in Dell EMC RSA BSAFE MES version 4.0.x prior to 4.0.11 and version 4.1.x prior to 4.1.6.1. A remote...

CVE-2018-11057

RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite, versions prior to 4.0.11 in 4.0.x and prior to 4.1.6.1 in 4.1.x contains a Covert Timing Channel vulnerability during RSA decryption, also known as a Bleichenbacher attack on RSA decryption. A remote attacker may be able to recover a RSA key...

CVE-2018-12240

The Norton Identity Safe product prior to 5.3.0.976 may be susceptible to a privilege escalation issue via a hard coded IV, which is a type of vulnerability that can potentially increase the likelihood of encrypted data being recovered without adequate credentials...

Privilege escalation

The Norton Identity Safe product prior to 5.3.0.976 may be susceptible to a privilege escalation issue via a hard coded IV, which is a type of vulnerability that can potentially increase the likelihood of encrypted data being recovered without adequate credentials...

The ROBOT Attack - Return of Bleichenbacher's Oracle Threat

A plaintext recovery of encrypted messages or a Man-in-the-middle MiTM attack on RSA PKCS 1 v1.5 encryption may be possible without knowledge of the server's private key...

CVE-2018-15876

An issue was discovered in the ajax-bootmodal-login plugin 1.4.3 for WordPress. The register form, login form, and password-recovery form require solving a CAPTCHA to perform actions. However, this is required only once per user session, and therefore one could send as many requests as one wished...