CVE-2024-55553

In FRRouting FRR before 10.3 from 6.0 onward, all routes are re-validated if the total size of an update received via RTR exceeds the internal socket's buffer size, default 4K on most OSes. An attacker can use this to trigger re-parsing of the RIB for FRR routers using RTR by causing more than th...

CVE-2024-55553

In FRRouting FRR before 10.3 from 6.0 onward, all routes are re-validated if the total size of an update received via RTR exceeds the internal socket's buffer size, default 4K on most OSes. An attacker can use this to trigger re-parsing of the RIB for FRR routers using RTR by causing more than th...

CVE-2024-55553

FRR vulnerability CVE-2024-55553 affects FRR prior to 10.3 (from 6.0 onward): when the total size of updates via RTR exceeds the internal socket buffer (default 4 KB), all routes are re-validated, enabling an attacker to trigger re-parsing of the RIB by sending more updates than the buffer in an ...

CVE-2024-56375

An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences and, shortly afterwards, writes to this array during a...

CVE-2024-56375

CVE-2024-56375 affects Fort Validator Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 (before 1.6.5). A malicious RPKI repository can serve a Manifest RPKI object with an empty fileList. An integer underflow causes the surrounding loop to iterate infinitely, dereferencing an array that effectively doesn’t exist and leading...

CVE-2024-56375

An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences and, shortly afterwards, writes to this array during a...

CVE-2024-56375

An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences and, shortly afterwards, writes to this array during a...

CVE-2024-56375

An integer underflow was discovered in Fort 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 before 1.6.5. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a trusted Trust Anchor can serve via rsync or RRDP a Manifest RPKI object containing an empty fileList. Fort dereferences and, shortly afterwards, writes to this array during a...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56170

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI manifests are listings of relevant files that clients are supposed to verify. Assuming everything else is correct, the most recent version of a manifest should be prioritized over other versions, to prevent...

CVE-2024-56170

Fort Validator (Fort) versions up to 1.6.4 prior to 2.0.0 contain a validation integrity issue in RPKI manifest handling. The root cause is that the system does not compare the up-to-dateness of the most recently fetched manifest against the cached one, allowing a rollback to a valid outdated man...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

CVE-2024-56169

Fort Validator (Fort) versions up to 1.6.4 are affected by a validation integrity issue where the backup cache is only used to save bandwidth, and there is no viable fallback if a fetch fails or yields incorrect files. This leads to incomplete route-origin validation data. Upgrading to 2.0.0 or l...

CVE-2024-56169

A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties such as Fort are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently...

CVE-2021-1440

A vulnerability in the implementation of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure RPKI feature of Cisco IOS XR Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause the Border Gateway Protocol BGP process to crash, resulting in a denial of service DoS condition. This vulnerability is du...