HTTP Request Smuggling

puma is vulnerable to HTTP Request Smuggling. The vulnerability exists as a Puma::Client allows smuggling of a request through a proxy, and subsequently causing the proxy to send a response back to another Puma::Client...

Puma Environment Error Vulnerability

Puma is a Web server for highly concurrent applications from Evan Phoenix Software Developers in the United States. Puma suffers from an environment error vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to conduct HTTP smuggling attacks...

Puma Environment Error Vulnerability (CNVD-2020-31666)

Puma is a web server for highly concurrent applications. Puma suffers from an environment error vulnerability. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to conduct HTTP smuggling attacks with an invalid transfer-encoding header...

HTTP Request Smuggling

Overview puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process...

HTTP Request Smuggling

Overview puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process...

CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

DEBIAN-CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

DEBIAN-CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

Code injection

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

Cross site request forgery (csrf)

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-11076

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.4 and 3.12.5, an attacker could smuggle an HTTP response, by using an invalid transfer-encoding header. The problem has been fixed in Puma 3.12.5 and Puma 4.3.4...

UBUNTU-CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

CVE-2020-11077 HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...

CVE-2020-11077

CVE-2020-11077 affects the Puma RubyGem HTTP server. It describes an HTTP request/response smuggling scenario where a proxy with persistent connections and HTTP pipelining can cause the proxy to deliver a second response to the wrong client, due to how Puma parses the first request and its body. ...

CVE-2020-11077

In Puma RubyGem before 4.3.5 and 3.12.6, a client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the firs...