CVE-2026-0038

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0032

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0038

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0038

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0032

CVE-2026-0032 describes a possible out-of-bounds write in multiple functions of the mem_protect.c file, caused by a logic error, enabling local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges and without user interaction. The affected component appears to be kernel/media-related c...

CVE-2026-0032

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0031

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0031

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0031

In multiple functions of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0030

In hostcheckpagestaterange of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

EUVD-2026-9244

In hostcheckpagestaterange of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0030

CVE-2026-0030 affects Android kernel code, specifically the function __host_check_page_state_range in mem_protect.c. The issue is an out-of-bounds write caused by an incorrect bounds check, enabling local privilege escalation without user interaction. Public descriptions across NVD, Red Hat, NCSC...

CVE-2026-0030

In hostcheckpagestaterange of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0030

In hostcheckpagestaterange of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2026-0028

In pkvmhostshareguest of memprotect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation...

CVE-2025-58405

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

How to Protect Your SaaS from Bot Attacks with SafeLine WAF

Most SaaS teams remember the day their user traffic started growing fast. Few notice the day bots started targeting them. On paper, everything looks great: more sign-ups, more sessions, more API calls. But in reality, something feels off: Sign-ups increase, but users aren’t activating. Server cos...

CVE-2025-58405 Lack of protection mechanisms against Clickjacking attacks

The CGM CLININET application does not implement any mechanisms that prevent clickjacking attacks, neither HTTP security headers nor HTML-based frame‑busting protections were detected. As a result, an attacker can embed the application inside a maliciously crafted IFRAME and trick users into...

kernel: smc: Use __sk_dst_get() and dst_dev_rcu() in smc_clc_prfx_match()

A flaw was found in the Linux kernel’s SMC Shared Memory Communication module: in smcclcprfxmatch, the function is called from smclistenwork without proper RCU or RTNL protection. The code previously used skdstgetsk-dev, which can lead to a use-after-free UAF condition if the sk’s destination is...

PT-2026-22680

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions versions prior to 2026-0032 Description A flaw exists in multiple functions within the mem protect.c file that may allow for a local escalation of privilege. The issue stems from a logic error that results in a potential out-of-bounds write...