294 matches found
F5 BIG-IP SSH Private Key Exposure
F5 ships a public/private key pair on BIG-IP appliances that allows passwordless authentication to any other BIG-IP box. Since the key is easily retrievable, an attacker can use it to gain unauthorized remote access as root. Module Options msf use exploit/linux/ssh/f5/bigipknownprivkey msf...
CVE-2011-1945
The elliptic curve cryptography ECC subsystem in OpenSSL 1.0.0d and earlier, when the Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm ECDSA is used for the ECDHEECDSA cipher suite, does not properly implement curves over binary fields, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine...
CVE-2004-2397
The web-based Management Console in Blue Coat Security Gateway OS 3.0 through 3.1.3.13 and 3.2.1, when importing a private key, stores the key and its passphrase in plaintext in a log file, which allows attackers to steal digital certificates...
CVE-2004-2682
PeerSec MatrixSSL before 1.1 does not implement RSA blinding, which allows context-dependent attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using timing differences on 1 the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and 2 the use of different integer...
CVE-2004-2721
The CheckGroup function in openSkat VTMF before 2.1 generates public key pairs in which the "p" variable might not be prime, which allows remote attackers to determine the private key and decrypt messages...
CVE-2003-0971
GnuPG GPG 1.0.2, and other versions up to 1.2.3, creates ElGamal type 20 sign+encrypt keys using the same key component for encryption as for signing, which allows attackers to determine the private key from a signature...
[Full-Disclosure] GnuPG's ElGamal signing keys compromised
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 GnuPG's ElGamal signing keys compromised ========================================== Summary ======= Phong Nguyen identified a severe bug in the way GnuPG creates and uses ElGamal keys for signing. This is a significant security failure which can lead ...
CVE-2003-0147
OpenSSL does not use RSA blinding by default, which allows local and remote attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using timing differences on 1 the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and 2 the use of different integer multiplication algorithms...
CVE-2003-0147
OpenSSL does not use RSA blinding by default, which allows local and remote attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using timing differences on 1 the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and 2 the use of different integer multiplication algorithms...
CVE-2003-0147
OpenSSL does not use RSA blinding by default, which allows local and remote attackers to obtain the server's private key by determining factors using timing differences on 1 the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and 2 the use of different integer multiplication algorithms...
Vulnerability in OpenSSL CVE-2003-0147
RSA blinding was not enabled by default, which could allow local and remote attackers to obtain a server’s private key by determining factors using timing differences on 1 the number of extra reductions during Montgomery reduction, and 2 the use of different integer multiplication algorithms...
OpenSSL < 0.9.6j / 0.9.7b Multiple Vulnerabilities
According to its banner, the remote host is using a version of OpenSSL older than 0.9.6j or 0.9.7b. This version is vulnerable to a timing-based attack that could allow an attacker to guess the content of fixed data blocks and may eventually be able to guess the value of the private RSA key of th...
Bug in SSH1 secure-RPC support can expose users' private keys
Hello all, There is a bug in SSH-1.2.30 involving Secure RPC. The patch for this is available at http://www.ssh.com/patches.html. The explanation and bug was submitted by Richard Silverman [email protected], and his explanation of the bug is below. The SSH1 protocol is not formally supported by SSH...
DUO-PSA-2020-004: Duo Product Security Advisory
Duo Product Security Advisory Advisory ID: DUO-PSA-2020-004 CVE: CVE-2020-3483 Publication Date: 2020-08-13 Revision Date: 2020-08-13 Status: Confirmed, Fixed Document Revision: 1 Overview Duo has identified and fixed an issue with the Duo Network Gateway DNG product in which some customer-provid...