Arbitrary parameters

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact There is no way to check that the sequence parameter is indeed a correct one Proof of Concept It is being passed straight to a function which modifies the KVStore's pools, thus it could be any value due to not being checked e. g. it could be 0,...

CVE-2023-3114

Terraform Enterprise since v202207-1 did not properly implement authorization rules for agent pools, allowing the workspace to be targeted by unauthorized agents. This authorization flaw could potentially allow a workspace to access resources from a separate, higher-privileged workspace in the sa...

CVE-2023-3114

Terraform Enterprise before v202306-1 is affected by CVE-2023-3114, due to improper authorization rules for agent pools that could allow a workspace to be targeted by unauthorized agents. This could enable a workspace to access resources from another, higher-privileged workspace within the same o...

HashiCorp Terraform 安全漏洞

HashiCorp Terraform is an open source tool for provisioning and managing cloud infrastructures from HashiCorp, USA. A security vulnerability exists in Terraform Enterprise prior to version v202207-1 that stems from not properly enforcing authorization rules for agent pools, which could result in ...

PT-2023-23173 · Hashicorp · Terraform Enterprise

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Terraform Enterprise versions prior to v202306-1 Description: The issue is related to improper implementation of authorization rules for agent pools, allowing workspaces to be targeted by unauthorized agents. This could potentially enable a...

CVE-2023-3114: Incorrect Privilege Assignment

Terraform Enterprise since v202207-1 did not properly implement authorization rules for agent pools, allowing the workspace to be targeted by unauthorized agents. This authorization flaw could potentially allow a workspace to access resources from a separate, higher-privileged workspace in the sa...

Ransomware Hackers and Scammers Utilizing Cloud Mining to Launder Cryptocurrency

Ransomware actors and cryptocurrency scammers have joined nation-state actors in abusing cloud mining services to launder digital assets, new findings reveal. "Cryptocurrency mining is a crucial part of our industry, but it also holds special appeal to bad actors, as it provides a means to acquir...

Ransomware Hackers and Scammers Utilizing Cloud Mining to Launder Cryptocurrency

Ransomware actors and cryptocurrency scammers have joined nation-state actors in abusing cloud mining services to launder digital assets, new findings reveal. "Cryptocurrency mining is a crucial part of our industry, but it also holds special appeal to bad actors, as it provides a means to acquir...

The increaseTotalValidatorActiveCount in PermissionedPool incorrectly adds requiredValidators instead of validatorToDeposit

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact When the Stader Stake Pools Manager calls stakeUserETHToBeacon chain, it does so calculating the requiredValidators that can be added to the pool. The function internally also uses the allocateValidatorsAndUpdaterOperatorId to compute each operator's...

Attacker can frontrun user bid with wrong lotId and create the lot with that lotId, forcing the user to take a big loss

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact User takes a huge loss by getting 1 SD token, but bidding an amount possibly much bigger. Attackers are incetivized to perform this if they are ETHx holders and want to increase the value of their tokens. Proof of Concept When a user adds a bid to the...

Lack checks if Pool deployed by the canonical UniswapV3Factory in uniswapV3SwapCallback

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Loss of deserved tokens or DoS when users use this contract. Proof of Concept According to the uniswap docs: The caller of this method must be checked to be a UniswapV3Pool deployed by the canonical UniswapV3Factory. However, there is no check in this...

Borrower can redeem there collateral without repaying debt completely

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact A borrower can redeem token in a pool though it has been used as a collateral in another pool without repaying the debt. Borrower can redeem the token as underlying asset even if his/her loan position is in the situation of liquidation. Proof of Concept...

Wrong WhitePaperInterestRateModel block per year calculations incur losses for users and the protocol

Lines of code Vulnerability details Vulnerability Details Blocks per year calculations in WhitePaperInterestRateModel improperly assume 15 seconds block time, while on Binance Smart Chain it’s 3 seconds. This has grave consequences, because it is used in calculating borrower’s interest rate and...

Borrowers can be liquidated before default by being based on the borrowBalance from other pools

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Borrower can be liquidated before default based on the borrowBalance from other pools. In the liquidity snapshot, borrows from other pools are added as total borrow but the collateral that is used which might not be used as collateral for the poolfor the...

mint() function: an attacker can mint multiple position NFTs for one or more legit Ajna users who have LP in Ajna pools. This should not be possible.

Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact The current implementation of the mint function does not ensure that only the owner of a liquidity pool LP deposit can mint position NFTs. As a result, an attacker can mint multiple position NFTs on behalf of legitimate Ajna users who have LP in Ajna...

pacificpools.cz Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3259444

Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...

CVE-2022-46773

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

CVE-2022-46773

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

Input validation

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...

CVE-2022-46773 IBM Robotic Process Automation security bypass

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 - 21.0.7 and 23.0.0 is vulnerable to client-side validation bypass for credential pools. Invalid credential pools may be created as a result. IBM X-Force ID: 242951...