Elastic APM agent for Python client CGI proxy redirection flaw

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...

GHSA-V646-RX6W-R3QQ Improper Access Control in Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat 7.x through 7.0.70 and 8.x through 8.5.4, when the CGI Servlet is enabled, follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an...

DEBIAN-CVE-2021-23409

The package github.com/pires/go-proxyproto before 0.6.0 are vulnerable to Denial of Service DoS via creating connections without the proxy protocol header...

Forced Browsing in Twisted

Twisted before 16.3.1 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbou...

GHSA-3GQJ-CMXR-P4X2 Forced Browsing in Twisted

Twisted before 16.3.1 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbou...

CVE-2021-23351: Undefined Security Weakness

The package github.com/pires/go-proxyproto before 0.5.0 are vulnerable to Denial of Service DoS via the parseVersion1 function. The reader in this package is a default bufio.Reader wrapping a net.Conn. It will read from the connection until it finds a newline. Since no limits are implemented in t...

DEBIAN-CVE-2016-1000111

Twisted before 16.3.1 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbou...

PYSEC-2020-214

Twisted before 16.3.1 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbou...

CVE-2016-1000107

inets in Erlang possibly 22.1 and earlier follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an...

CVE-2016-1000107

inets in Erlang possibly 22.1 and earlier follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an...

DEBIAN-CVE-2016-1000108

yaws before 2.0.4 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbound...

CVE-2016-1000108

yaws before 2.0.4 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbound...

UBUNTU-CVE-2016-1000108

yaws before 2.0.4 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbound...

PT-2019-7507 · Erlang +2 · Erlang +2

Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: Erlang versions prior to 22.1 Description: The issue allows remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request. This is related to the handling of the...

CVE-2016-1000108: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site

yaws before 2.0.4 does not attempt to address RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 namespace conflicts and therefore does not protect CGI applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTPPROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect a CGI application's outbound...

UBUNTU-CVE-2016-1000104

A security Bypass vulnerability exists in the FcgidPassHeader Proxy in modfcgid through 2016-07-07...

The vulnerability of the mod_remoteip module in the Apache HTTP Server allows attackers to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of protected information.

The vulnerability of the modremoteip module in the Apache HTTP Server arises due to an overflow in the stack buffer. Exploiting this vulnerability allows a malicious actor to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and accessibility of the protected information by using a specially created PRO...

CVE-2019-7617

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...

PYSEC-2019-178

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...

CVE-2019-7617

When the Elastic APM agent for Python versions before 5.1.0 is run as a CGI script, there is a variable name clash flaw if a remote attacker can control the proxy header. This could result in an attacker redirecting collected APM data to a proxy of their choosing...