Updated gnutls packages fix security vulnerability

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

Cross site scripting

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way nettle handles endian conversion of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run a process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this flaw extract plaintext or in some cases...

CVE-2018-16868

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

CVE-2018-16868

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

CVE-2018-16869

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way nettle handles endian conversion of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run a process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this flaw extract plaintext or in some cases...

CVE-2018-16868

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

Cross site scripting

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

CVE-2018-16868

CVE-2018-16868 concerns a Bleichenbacher-type side-channel padding oracle in GnuTLS during PKCS#1 v1.5 RSA verification. The provided documents indicate this affects GnuTLS across Linux distributions (e.g., Red Hat). The attack requires local access on the same physical core as the victim process...

CVE-2018-16868

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

CVE-2018-16869

CVE-2018-16869 is a Bleichenbacher-type side-channel padding oracle vulnerability in the nettle cryptographic library, caused by how nettle handles endian conversion of RSA-decrypted PKCS#1 v1.5 data. Exploitation could allow an attacker on the same physical core to extract plaintext or, in some ...

CVE-2018-16869

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way nettle handles endian conversion of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run a process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this flaw extract plaintext or in some cases...

CVE-2018-16868

A Bleichenbacher type side-channel based padding oracle attack was found in the way gnutls handles verification of RSA decrypted PKCS1 v1.5 data. An attacker who is able to run process on the same physical core as the victim process, could use this to extract plaintext or in some cases downgrade...

CVE-2018-16150

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509...

CVE-2018-16150

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509...

Code injection

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509...

CVE-2018-16253

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509...

CVE-2018-16149

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification blindly trusts the declared lengths in the ASN.1 structure. Consequently, when small public exponents are being used, a remote attacker can generate purposefully crafted signatures and put them on X.50...

CVE-2018-16149

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification blindly trusts the declared lengths in the ASN.1 structure. Consequently, when small public exponents are being used, a remote attacker can generate purposefully crafted signatures and put them on X.50...

Code injection

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification does not reject excess data after the hash value. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509...

CVE-2018-16253

In sigverify in x509.c in axTLS version 2.1.3 and before, the PKCS1 v1.5 signature verification does not properly verify the ASN.1 metadata. Consequently, a remote attacker can forge signatures when small public exponents are being used, which could lead to impersonation through fake X.509...