11282 matches found
CVE-2022-4138
Removed by vendor...
CVE-2023-21450
Missing Authorization vulnerability in One Hand Operation + prior to version 6.1.21 allows multi-users to access owner's widget without authorization via gesture setting...
CVE-2023-21432
Improper access control vulnerabilities in Smart Things prior to 1.7.93 allows to attacker to invite others without authorization of the owner...
Missed owner accrual in MultiRewardStaking _withdraw() leads to reward loss
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Function withdraw can be called from an approved caller to withdraw owner funds. The function accrues rewards for caller and receiver but misses the accrual for owner. If, for example, the owner didn't accrue any reward from the beginning of time and all...
Upgraded Q -> 3 from #619 [1675724566035]
Judge has assessed an item in Issue 619 as 3 risk. The relevant finding follows: The function withdrawRemainingTokens can be changed in a safer way to handle the withdraw from the owner and the protocol fee as well. This prevent risks allocated with the protocol fees. By the docs this function is...
lapoinconneuse.com Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3178083
Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...
Hacked or malicious owner can steal all tokens
Lines of code Vulnerability details Tokens for all active drips are stored in the DripsHub contract. Since DripsHub is an upgradeable ERC1967Proxy, a malicious or hacked owner can simply upgrade the contract to include e.g., the following function: function stealTokensIERC20 token, address to,...
AddressRegistry might have non-actual record
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact AddressRegistry might has non-actual record, which leads to inconsistent AddressRegistry state, and might affect possible consumers. Proof of Concept To register favorite NFT user calls register function from AddressRegistry. Then he sold this NFT to...
Other users cannot help a CIDNFT holder add subprotocols to the NFT
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Other users cannot approve and help CIDNFT holders add subprotocols to the NFT, breaking protocol specifications. Proof of Concept In the video walkthrough, around the 8 minute mark, it is mentioned that users can help NFT holders add subprotocols to the...
An approved operator of a CID NFT owner can steall any subprotocol NFTs from the CID NFT Owner and his other approved operators.
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact Detailed description of the impact of this finding. An approved operator of a CID NFT owner, if becomes malicious or compromised, can steal any subprotocol NFTs from the CID NFT Owner and his other approved operators. This is possible because: after...
Authorization
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 12.9 prior to 15.3.5, 15.4 prior to 15.4.4, and 15.5 prior to 15.5.2. A group owner may be able to bypass External Authorization check, if it is enabled, to access git repositories and package registries by using...
Privilege escalation in project role template binding (PRTB) and -promoted roles
Impact An issue was discovered in Rancher versions from 2.5.0 up to and including 2.5.16 and from 2.6.0 up to and including 2.6.9, where an authorization logic flaw allows privilege escalation via project role template binding PRTB and -promoted roles. This issue is not present in Rancher 2.7...
Pool.sol: The collectProtocolFees() function can be called by anyone
Lines of code Vulnerability details Impact As specified in the documentation, the collectProtocolFees should be called only by the protocol owner. However, as this is an external function, an attacker is able to call it and to perform the actions inside the function. Proof of Concept The...
Upgraded Q -> M from #268 [1674418407759]
Judge has assessed an item in Issue 268 as M risk. The relevant finding follows: L-02 Front running attacks by the owner Project has one possible attack vectors by the onlyOwner: dao.Fees , burnsFees , referralFees , botFees variable; It determines the fees rate The default deposit fees equal zer...
ConduitController: Smart Contract Initial Owner Vulnerability
Lines of code Vulnerability details Bug Description The createConduit function in the ConduitController smart contract is responsible for deploying new conduits, or contracts that allow registered callers or open "channels" to transfer approved ERC20/721/1155 tokens on their behalf. The function...
wollermann.com.au Cross Site Scripting vulnerability OBB-3151976
Following the coordinated and responsible vulnerability disclosure guidelines of the ISO 29147 standard, Open Bug Bounty has: a. verified the vulnerability and confirmed its existence; b. notified the website operator about its existence. Technical details of the vulnerability are currently hidde...
PT-2023-14010 · Gitlab · Gitlab Ce/Ee +1
Name of the Vulnerable Software and Affected Versions: GitLab EE versions 13.11 through 15.5.6 GitLab EE versions 15.6 through 15.6.3 GitLab EE versions 15.7 through 15.7.1 Description: The issue is related to an incorrect authorization check, allowing group access tokens to remain active even...
Improper Access Control
github.com/peterzen/goresolver is vulnerable to improper access control. The vulnerability exists because the owner name of RRSIG RRs is not validated which allows an attacker to gain access to other domains...
Attacker can gain control of counterfactual wallet
Lines of code Vulnerability details A counterfactual wallet can be used by pre-generating its address using the SmartAccountFactory.getAddressForCounterfactualWallet function. This address can then be securely used for example, sending funds to this address knowing in advance that the user will...
Lack of owner verification in EIP-1271 signature check
Lines of code Vulnerability details Description In the checkSignatures there are checks that the signer is the account owner, but in the case of EIP-1271 signature check there are no such checks: // If v is 0 then it is a contract signature // When handling contract signatures the address of the...